Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:58.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aluminum Acceptors in Inequivalent Sites in 4H-Sic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S.R. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Dayton Research Institute, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-0178
A.O. Evwaraye
Affiliation:
University of Dayton, Physics Department, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-2314
W.C. Mitchel
Affiliation:
Materials Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433-7077
Get access

Abstract

P-type conductivity is normally produced in silicon carbide by doping with Al or B. The aluminum atom substitutes for silicon in the SiC lattice. Several studies have shown that nitrogen, which substitutes for carbon atoms and produces n-type conductivity in SiC, sits at the two inequivalent lattice sites in 4H-SiC, and two N activation energies of 53 meV (h) and 100 meV (k) have been reported.

Hall effect measurements and infrared absorption studies of SiC doped with Al showed only one Al activation energy, however, and the published Al activation energy in SiC (3C, 4H, and 6H) ranges from 191 meV to 280 meV. This has lead to the general conclusion that the activation energy of Al acceptors in SiC does not depend on the polytype or on the lattice site occupied.

Thermal Admittance Spectroscopy (TAS) has been used to determine the activation energy of Al in 4H-SiC specimens where NA-ND ranged from 7.2 × 1015 cm2to 5.6 × 1018 cm−2. By analogy to B in 6H-SiC, we propose two levels for Al in 4H-SiC at Ev + 0.212 eV and Ev + 0.266 eV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pensl, G. and Choyke, W.J., Physica B, 185, 264283 (1993)Google Scholar
2. Smith, S.R., Evwaraye, A.O., and Mitchel, W.C., Physica Stat. Sol. (a) 162, p. 162 (1997)Google Scholar
3. Ikeda, M., Matsunami, H., and Tanaka, T., J. Luminescence 20, p. 111 (1979)Google Scholar
4. Evwaraye, A.O., Smith, S.R., Mitchel, W.C, and Hobgood, H. McD., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, p. 1186 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Losee, D.L., J. Appl. Phys. 46, p. 2204 (1975)Google Scholar
6. Evwaraye, A. O., Smith, S.R. and Mitchel, W.C., J. Appl. Phys., (to be published)Google Scholar
7. Evwaraye, A.O., Smith, S.R., and Mitchel, W.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, p. 3159 (1996)Google Scholar
8. Mitchel, W.C., Evwaraye, A.O., Smith, S.R., and Roth, M.D., J. Electron. Mater. 26, p. 113 (1997)Google Scholar