Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T08:04:43.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alpha-Spectroscopy and Leach Testing of Synroc Doped With Actinide Elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

K. P. Hart
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai 2234, Australia
E. R. Vance
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai 2234, Australia
R. Stanojevic
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai 2234, Australia
R. A. Day
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Synroc specimens doped individually with ˜ 1 wt% of Np or Pu have been studied, after leaching for >2,500 days, using α-spectroscopy and SEM. In the last leaching period, the leachant was replaced on either a daily or monthly basis. When the leachant was replaced on a daily basis the release rate of Np was similar to that measured when the samples were first leached, whereas for the monthly replacement the release rates of Np or Pu were about a factor of 20 to 30 lower than that for daily replacement. These findings agree generally with the results obtained from surface examination of the samples which showed that the thickness of actinidedepleted surface layer of anatase was 0.3 μm for monthly replacement but only 0.1 μm when the leachant was replaced frequently. Overall, the results suggest that release of actinides from Synroc are controlled by solubility limiting effects at the surface area to volume ratios employed in MCC-1 tests.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vance, E. R., Begg, B. D., Day, R. A. and Ball, C. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, 767774, 1995.Google Scholar
2. Jostsons, A., Vance, E. R., Mercer, D. J. and Oversby, V. M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., pp. 775781.Google Scholar
3. Banba, T. and Hart, K. (1996), Report on the Japan-Australia Co-operative Program on Research and Development of Technology for the Management of High Level Radioactive Wastes: Phase 11 (1990-1995) JAERI-Tech 96–024.Google Scholar
4. Smith, K. L., Lumpkin, G. R., Blackford, M. G., Hambley, M., Day, R. A., Hart, K. P. and Jostsons, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, 12671272, 1997.Google Scholar
5. Jostsons, A., Vance, E. R., Day, R. A., Hart, K. P. and Stewart, M. W. A. (1996), Spectrum ’96, International Topical Meeting on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management.Google Scholar
6. Levins, D. M., Hart, K. P., McGlinn, P. J., Lam, P., Seatonberry, B. W., Robinson, B. J., Smith, K. L. and Leung, S., ANSTO report ANSTO C/223, 150,1991.Google Scholar
7. Martin, J. F. and Coniglio, M., Nuclear Instruments and Methods 42, 302304, 1966.Google Scholar
8. Blackford, M. G., Smith, K. L. and Hart, K. P., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 257, 243249 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Vernaz, E. Y. and Godon, N., Leaching of Actinides from Nuclear Waste Glass: French Experience, Proc. Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, Strasbourg, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp 3748, 1991.Google Scholar
10. Matzke, Hj., Toscano, E., Walker, E. T. and Solomah, A. G., Advanced Ceramic Materials, 3«3», 285–288, 1988.Google Scholar