Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:58:51.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alkaline Degradation of Cellulose: Estimation of the Concentration of Isosaccharinic Acid in Cement Porewater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L.R. Van Loon
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Waste Management, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland. [email protected]
M.A. Glaus
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Waste Management, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
S. Stallone
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Waste Management, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
A. Laube
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Waste Management, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

The sorption of radionuclides on repository components (e.g. cement) is an important process since it controls the release of radionuclides from the repository [1]. A strong sorption of radionuclides is desirable since it will allow only a small release of radionuclides to the geo-and biosphere. The strong sorption behaviour of radionuclides, however, could possibly be decreased by several orders of magnitude by the presence of organic ligands. Ligands such as EDTA, NTA, citric acid etc. are inherent components of radioactive waste since these complexing agents are used in nuclear power stations for decontaminating purposes. Other ligands might be formed by degrading organic polymers present in low and intermediate level radioactive waste [2, 3]. Cellulose materials such as cotton, paper and wood form a substantial part (ca. 50 %) of the organic waste [1]. The use of large amounts of cement for constructing a repository causes alkaline environments in which the pH of the pore solution will remain above 12.5 for periods of the order of 105 years [4]. It is well known from the literature that cellulose is unstable under alkaline conditions and will degrade to water soluble, low molecular weight compounds by the peeling-off reaction [5]. The main degradation product of cellulose is isosaccharinic acid (ISA), which is stable under alkaline conditions [5-10]. ISA enhances the solubility of Pu(IV) [7, 8] and has an adverse effect on the sorption of Eu(III), Th(IV) and Ni(II) [6]. For instance, in a solution of 10-3 M ISA, the solubility of Pu(IV) at pH 12 increases by a factor of 20000 [11]. The sorption of Pu(IV) [8], Eu(III), Th(IV) and Ni(II) [6], however, was affected to only a minor extent. The observed effects were - by analogy with gluconic acid [12] - interpreted to be due to a strong complexation of these metals. The concentration of ISA in the pore water is the key parameter for evaluating its effect on radionuclide sorption [13].

A full assessment of the effect of cellulose degradation on the sorption requires a detailed understanding of the mechanisms involved. The present study gives an overview of the different processes involved and describes how to quantify the concentration of isosaccharinic acid in the pore water of a repository.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Nagra Technical Report NTB 94-06, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (1994)Google Scholar
[2] Loon, L.R. Van and Kopajtic, Z., Radiochimica Acta 54, p. 193 (1991).Google Scholar
[3] Loon, L.R. Van and Hummel, W., PSI-Bericht 95-13, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland (1995) and Nagra Technical Report NTB 95-08, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (1995)Google Scholar
[4] Berner, U., PSI-Bericht 62, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland (1990) and Nagra Technical Report NTB 90-12, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (1990)Google Scholar
[5] Whistler, R.L. and BeMiller, J.N, Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry 13, p. 289 (1958).Google Scholar
[6] Loon, L.R. Van, Glaus, M.A., Stallone, S. and Laube, A., Internal Technical Report TM-44-96-01, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland (1996) and Nagra Technical Report NTB 97-04 (in preparation).Google Scholar
[7] Moreton, A.D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 294, p. 753 (1993).Google Scholar
[8] Greenfield, B.F., Harrison, W.N., Robertson, G.P., Somers, P.J. and Spindler, M.W., UK Nirex Report NSS/R272 (1993)Google Scholar
[9] Greenfield, B.F., Hurdus, M.H., Pilkington, N.J., Spindler, M.W. and Williams, S.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 333, p. 705 (1994).Google Scholar
[10] Bourbon, X. and Toulhoat, P., Radiochimica Acta 74, p. 315 (1996).Google Scholar
[11] Greenfield, B.F., Holtom, G.F., Hurdus, M.H., O'Kelly, N., Pilkington, N.J., Rosevaer, A, Spindler, M.W. and Williams, S.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, p. 1151 (1995).Google Scholar
[12] Sawyer, D.T., Chem. Rev. 64, p. 633 (1964).Google Scholar
[13] Bradbury, M.H. and Loon, L.R. Van, Nagra Technical Report NTB 96-08, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland (1997)Google Scholar
[14] Haas, D.W., Hrutfiord, B.F. and Sarkanen, K.V., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 11, p. 587 (1967).Google Scholar
[15] Loon, L.R. Van and Glaus, M.A., Journal of Environmental Polymer Degradation 5, (1997)Google Scholar
[16] Loon, L.R. Van, Glaus, M.A., Stallone, S. and Laube, A., Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, p. 1243 (1997).Google Scholar