Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:46:00.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AFM analysis of HF Vapor Cleaned SiO2 Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. J. Carter ,
E. J. Bergman ,
D. R. Lee ,
J. Owyang  and
R. J. Nemanich
R. J. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Raleigh, NC 27695–8202;
E. J. Bergman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202;
D. R. Lee
Affiliation:
Semitool, 655 West Reserve Dr., Kalispell, MT 59901;
J. Owyang
Affiliation:
Semitool, 655 West Reserve Dr., Kalispell, MT 59901;
R. J. Nemanich
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Raleigh, NC 27695–8202; LSI Logic, 3115 Alfred St., MS J-202, Santa Clara, CA 95054;
Get access

Abstract

Si(100) surfaces were cleaned using HF/IPA vapor chemistries at ambient pressure and temperature with nitrogen as the carrier gas. Three distinct cases for oxide removal were studied: vapor etching of native oxides, RCA chemical oxides, and thermal oxides. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was used to characterize the surface morphology after the HF vapor etching process. The AFM indicated exaggerated peaks in random places on the surface, These peaks were identified as residue remaining after the vapor etching process. The average lateral width of the peaks were ∼ 50 nm. The average height of the peaks for native and chemical oxide etched surfaces was relatively the same, approximately 8 nm. The average height of the peaks after thermal oxide removal was significantly smaller, approximately 1–2 nm. Peak density for native oxide etched surfaces was significantly greater than chemical or thermal oxide etched surfaces. We suggest that impurities in the oxide contribute to residue formation on the surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 477 , 1997 , 481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Deal, B.E. and Helms, C.R., Vapor Phase Wafer Cleaning Technology, in Handbook of Semiconductor Wafer Cleaning Technology, ed. by Kern, W. (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ 1993) pp. 274–339.Google Scholar
2. Deal, B.E., McNeilly, M.A., Kao, D.B., deLarios, J.M., Solid State Technology, 73 (July 1990).Google Scholar
3. Wong, M., Moslehi, M.M., and Reed, D.W., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.138, No. 6, 1799 (June 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Watanabe, H., Kitajima, H., Honma, I., Ono, H., Wilhelm, R.J., and Sophie, A.J.L., J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol.142, No. 4, 1332 (April 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. deLarios, J.M. and Borland, J.O., J. Electrochem. Soc. Conf. Proc, 347 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Witowski, B., Chacon, J., and Menon, V., J. Electrochem. Soc. Conf. Proc, 372 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Ma, Y., Green, M.L., Feldman, L.C., Sapjeta, J., Hanson, K.J., and Weidman, T.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13(4), 1460 (Jul/Aug 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Torek, K., Ruzyllo, J., Grant, R., and Novak, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.142, No. 4, 1322 (April 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ma, Y., Green, M.L., Torek, K., Ruzyllo, J., Opila, R., Konstadinidis, K., Siconolfi, D., and Brasen, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.142, No. 11, L217 (November 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Helms, C.R. and Deal, B.E., Journal of the Institute of Environmental Sciences, Vol.35, 21 (May/June 1992).Google Scholar
11. Kuiper, A.E.T. and Lathouwas, E.G.C., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.139, No. 9, 2594 (September 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Holmes, P.J. and Snell, J.E., Microelectron. Reliab. 5, 337 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lee, C.S., Baek, J.T., and Yoo, H.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.143, No. 3, 1099 (March 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar