Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:39:50.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adjustment of Membrane Stress Using Aluminum Oxide and Silicon Dioxide Multi Layer Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Ryuichi Kubo
Affiliation:
Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd., Kyoto, JAPAN
Yukio Yoshino
Affiliation:
Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd., Kyoto, JAPAN
Kazuhiro Inoue
Affiliation:
Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd., Kyoto, JAPAN
Takahiro Makino
Affiliation:
Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd., Kyoto, JAPAN
Seiichi Arai
Affiliation:
Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd., Kyoto, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Relaxation of internal stress for micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) using SiO2 / Al2O3 / SiO2 membrane has been studied. The aluminum oxide thin films were formed by electron beam evaporation at room temperature. No peaks were observed in the X-ray diffraction pattern of the films. The ratio of Al and O in aluminum oxide was stoichiometric compared with Al2O3 target material. The internal stress was tensile at about 300-400 MPa. Bottom SiO2 thin film was formed by thermal oxidation and the top one by RF magnetron sputtering method. The internal stress of thermally oxidized SiO2 film was compressive at about 440 MPa, while that of the films deposited by sputtering, was compressive at about 100 MPa. The ratio of Si and O in each SiO2 thin films remained stoichiometric. The total stress of the membrane was controlled by optimizing the thickness of each film for relaxing the total stress of the membrane. The total stress of the membrane became almost zero under optimum conditions of SiO2 and Al2O3 films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Aste, S., Scheid, E., Gue, A.M., Guillement, J.P., Lescouzeres, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 518, 99 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Briand, D., Schoot, B. van der, Jeanneret, S., Clerc, P.-A., Rooij, Nico F.de in IEEE Transducers '99 Proc., 2, 938 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Sarro, P.M., Herwaarden, A.W. van, Vlist, W. van der, Sensors and Actuators A, 41, 666 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Du, Chen-Hsun, Lin, Zongshen, Lee, Chengkuo, Technical Digest of the 17th Sensor Symposium Proc., 165 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, Xin, Zhang, Tong-Yi, Zohar, Yitshak, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 518, 155 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Hirota, M., Satou, F., Morita, S., Technical Digest of the Technical Digest of the17th Sensor Symposium, 151 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Shibata, C., Kimura, C., Mikami, K., The 1st Sensor Symposium Proc., 221 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Lahiji, G. R. and Kensall, D., IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED29, 14(1982).Google Scholar