Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T14:20:27.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adhesion Measurement of Interfaces in Multilayer Interconnect Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Qing Ma ,
John Bumgarner ,
Harry Fujimoto ,
Michael Lane  and
Reinhold H. Dauskardt
Qing Ma
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
John Bumgarner
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Harry Fujimoto
Affiliation:
Components Research, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Michael Lane
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, CA 94305
Reinhold H. Dauskardt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

Interface decohesion is increasingly becoming a reliability concern in multilayer interconnect structures. It is therefore necessary to provide adhesion tests as a part of materials characterization procedures and to study the fundamental material properties that affect interface toughness. A sandwich structure 4-point bend test was developed for measuring the adhesion between interlayer dielectric and metal interfaces. This technique offers well defined and easily controllable fracture processes and simple analyses based rigorously on fracture mechanics. Using this technique, a number of interfaces were studied. For conventional interconnect systems consisting of Al lines and SiO2 as the interlayer dielectric, the focus was to improve the interface fracture toughness through structure design and process engineering. Potential low dielectric constant materials, such as polymers and porous SiO2, were also studied as candidates for interlayer dielectric materials in the future. Interface strengthening effects of both mechanical and chemical origin, including interface roughness and thin film plasticity, as well as alteration of chemical bonding were explored.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 473: Symposium J – Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VII , 1997 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

1. Hutchinson, J.W. and Suo, Z., “Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials”, Adv. Appl. Mech., 29, 63–191, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Venkatraman, S.K., Kohlstedt, D.L., and Gerberich, W.W. “Metal-Ceramic Interfacial Fracture Resistance Using the Continuous Microscratch Technique”, Thin Solid Films, 223, 269–275, 1993.Google Scholar
3. Chalker, P.R., Bull, S.J., and Rickerby, D.S. “A Review of the Methods for the Evaluation of Coating-Substrate Adhesion”, Mat. Sci. Engr., A140, 583–592, 1991.Google Scholar
4. Xu, G., Ragan, D.D., Clarke, R.R., He, M., Ma, Q., and Fujimoto, H., “Measurement of the Fracture Energy of SiO2/TiN Interfaces Using the Residually-Stresses Thin-Film Micro-Strip Test”, MRS Symposium Proceedings, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Jain, V., Adibi-Rizi, F., Moghadam, F. and Dauskardt, R.H., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V, edited by Oates, A.S., Filter, W.F., Rosenberg, R., Greer, A.L. and Gadepally, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 391, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
6. Ma, Q., Pan, C., Fujimoto, H., Triplett, B., Coon, P. and Chiang, C., Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J. and Baker, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996) pp. 379–384.Google Scholar
7. Charalambides, P.G., Lund, J., Evans, A.G. and McMeeking, R.M., “A Test Specimen for Determining the Fracture Resistance of Bimaterial Interfaces”, J. Appl Mech., 111, 77–82, 1989.Google Scholar
8. Ma, Q., “A Four-Point Bending Technique for Studying Subcriticai Crack Growth in Thin Films and at Interfaces”, J. Materials Research, 12, 840–845, 1997.Google Scholar
9. Ma, Q., Intel Internal Technical Memos.Google Scholar
10. Wiederhorn, S.M., Int. J. Fract. Mech. 4, 171, 1968.Google Scholar
11. Dauskardt, R.H., Lane, M., Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., and Krishna, N., “Progressive Debonding Of Interfaces In Multilayer Interconnect Structures”, in preparation.Google Scholar
12. Suo, Z., Shih, C.F. and Varias, A.G., “A Theory for Cleavage Cracking in the Presence of Plasticity”, Acta Metall. Mater., 41, 1551–1557, 1993.Google Scholar
13. Tvergaard, V. and Hutchinson, J.W., “Toughness of an Interface Along a Thin Ductile Layer Joining Elastic Solids”, Phil. Mag. A, 70, 641–656, 1994.Google Scholar
14. Yoshimaru, M., Yoshie, T., Kageyama, M., Shimokawa, K., Fukuda, Y., Onoda, H., and Ino, M., “Deoxidization of Water Desorbed From APCVD TEOS-O3 SiO2 by Ti Cap Layer”, in IEEE International Reliability Physics Proceedings, 1995, pp. 359–364.Google Scholar