Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:11:31.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activation Characteristics of Donor and Acceptor Implants in GaN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X. A. Cao ,
S. J. Pearton ,
R. K. Singh ,
R. G. Wilson ,
J. A. Sekhar ,
J. C. Zolper ,
J. Han ,
D. J. Rieger ,
R. J. Shul  and
H. J. Guo
...Show all authors
X. A. Cao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
R. K. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
R. G. Wilson
Affiliation:
Consultant, Stevenson Ranch, CA 91381, USA
J. A. Sekhar
Affiliation:
Micropyretics Heaters International, Inc. Cincinnati, OH 45215, USA
J. C. Zolper
Affiliation:
Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA 22217, USA
J. Han
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
D. J. Rieger
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
R. J. Shul
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
H. J. Guo
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, Oak Ridge, TN 3783 l,USA
S. J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, Oak Ridge, TN 3783 l,USA
J. M. Zavada
Affiliation:
European Research Office, USARDSG, London, England
Get access

Abstract

The ionization levels of different donor and acceptor species implanted into GaN were measured by temperature-dependent Hall data after high temperature (1400 °C) annealing. The values obtained were 28 meV (Si), 48 meV (S), 50 meV (Te) for the donors, and 170 meV for Mg acceptor. P-type conductivity was not achieved with either Be or C implantation. Basically all of the implanted species show no distribution during activation annealing. For high implant doses (5×1015 cm−2) a high concentration of extended defects remains after 1100 °C anneals, but higher temperatures (1400 °C) produces a significant improvement in crystalline quality in the implanted region.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 572: Symposium Y – Wide-Bandgap Semiconductors for High-Power, High Frequency… , 1999 , 513
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Zolper, J. C., GaN and Related Materials, edited by Pearton, S. J., p. 371 (Gordon and Breach, NY 1997).Google Scholar
2. Zolper, J. C. and Shul, R. J., MRS Bulletin 22, 36(1997).10.1557/S0883769400032553Google Scholar
3. Binari, S. C., Rowland, L. B., Kruppa, W., Kelner, G., Doverspike, K. and Gaskill, D. K., Electron. Lett. 30 1248(1994).10.1049/el:19940833Google Scholar
4. H. P. Maruska (unpublished, 1997).Google Scholar
5. Tan, H. H., Williams, J. S., Zou, J., Cockayne, D. J. H., Pearton, S. J. and Stall, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2364(1996).10.1063/1.117526Google Scholar
6. Porowski, S. and Grzegory, I., GaN and Related Materials, edited by Pearton, S. J., p. 295 (Gordon and Breach, NY 1997).Google Scholar
7. Zolper, J. C., Han, J., Van Deusen, S. B., Crawford, M. H., Biefeld, R. M., Jun, J., Suski, T., Baranowski, J. M. and Pearton, S. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 482, 609(1998).Google Scholar
8. Zolper, J. C., Reiger, D. J., Baca, A. G., Pearton, S. J., Lee, J. W. and Stall, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 538(1996).10.1063/1.117779Google Scholar
9. Fu, M., Sarvepalli, V., Singh, R. K., Abernathy, C. R., Cao, X. A., Pearton, S. J. and Sekhar, J. A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 483, 345(1998).10.1557/PROC-483-345Google Scholar
10. Mileham, J. R., Pearton, S. J., Abernathy, C. R., MacKenzie, J. D., Shul, R. J. and Kilcoyne, S. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1119(1995).10.1063/1.114980Google Scholar
11. Pearton, S. J., Williams, J. S., Short, K. T., Johnson, S. T., Jacobsen, D. C., Poate, J. M., Gibson, J. M. and Boerma, D. O., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1089(1989).10.1063/1.343044Google Scholar
12. Bogulawski, P., Briggs, E. L. and Bemholc, J., Phys. Rev. B 51, 17255(1995).10.1103/PhysRevB.51.17255Google Scholar
13. Abernathy, C. R., MacKenzie, J. D., Pearton, S. J. and Hobson, W. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66 1969(1995).10.1063/1.113293Google Scholar