Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:50:42.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accurate determination of orientation relationships between ferroelastic domains: the tetragonal to monoclinic transition in LaNbO4 as an example.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ø. Prytz
Affiliation:
Centre for Materials Science and Nanotechnology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1126 Blindern, N-0316 OSLO, Norway
J. Taftø
Affiliation:
Centre for Materials Science and Nanotechnology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1126 Blindern, N-0316 OSLO, Norway
Get access

Abstract

LaNbO4 crystallizes in a tetragonal high-temperature phase with space group I41/a, which transforms to a monoclinic phase upon cooling below 500 °C. The low-temperature phase has space group I2/a (C2/c) with a monoclinic angle β=94.1°. This system serves as a useful model of a ferroelastic transition of the 4/mF2/m type using the notation of Aizu [1]. This transition produces ferroelastic domains, the boundaries between which are parallel to the monoclinic b-axis. The orientation of these boundaries relative to the monoclinic a- and c-axes has been predicted by Sapriel [2] for all 94 ferroelastic species, and calculations specifically for the LaNbO4 system have been presented by Jian and Wayman [3].

We present an accurate determination of the boundary orientation in LaNbO4 using selected area electron diffraction. The boundary planes are parallel to the (2 0 –5.10)/(5.10 0 2) planes of the two domains, as opposed to the predictions of Jian and Wayman which indicate that the domain boundaries should be oriented parallel to the (2 0 -4.04)/(4.04 0 2) planes. Our experimental results are in good agreement with the results of a previous study [4].

Furthermore, we present a simple geometric model for calculating the boundary orientation based only on the unit cell parameters of the monoclinic phase. This model gives a boundary orientation in excellent agreement with our experimental determination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Aizu, K., Phys. Rev. B 2, 754772 (1970).Google Scholar
[2] Sapriel, J., Phys. Rev. B 12, 51285140 (1975).Google Scholar
[3] Jian, L. and Wayman, C. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 16421648 (1996).Google Scholar
[4] Tsunekawa, S. and Takei, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 50, 695702 (1978).Google Scholar
[5] Aizu, K., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 28, 706716 (1970).Google Scholar
[6] Schlenker, J. L., Gibbs, G. V. and Boisen, M. B. Jr, Acta Cryst. A34, 5254 (1978).Google Scholar
[7] David, W. I. F., Mater. Res. Bull. 18, 749756 (1983).Google Scholar
[8] Tanaka, M., Saito, R. and Watanabe, D., Acta Cryst. A36, 350352 (1980).Google Scholar
[9] Prytz, O. and Tafto, J., Acta Mat. 53, 297302 (2005)Google Scholar