Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:45:06.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zirconolite-Rich Ceramics for Actinide Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Eric R Vance
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, ANSTO, Menai, NSW2234, Australia.
B. D. Begg
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, ANSTO, Menai, NSW2234, Australia.
R. A. Day
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, ANSTO, Menai, NSW2234, Australia.
C. J. Ball
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, ANSTO, Menai, NSW2234, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

New X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy data are given for the incorporation of Np and Pu in zirconolite, at levels of tens of percent. The actinide valences and the cations they replace are deduced from the microanalysis of the zirconolite compositions, and X-ray absorption data are used to obtain more direct information on the valences of Ce and Nd, which are used as simulants of Pu and trivalent actinides respectively. Trivalent rare earths and actinides have extensive solid solubility in zirconolite, mainly but not exclusively in the Ca site. Tetravalent rare earths and actinides have considerable solid solubility in the Zr site of zirconolite, and some solubility in the Ca site, but the strong tendency of zirconolite with ions substituted in the Zr site to undergo phase separation complicates structural interpretation. In zirconolite-rich Synroc-type ceramics designed to immobilise waste actinides, the target actinide waste loading has been set at 20 wt% and early leach results indicate the durability is at least as good as that of Synroc-C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M. and Ramm, E.J., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988), p.233.Google Scholar
2. Vance, E.R. and Agrawal, D.K., Nucl. Chem. Wate Manage., 3, 229 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Pepin, J.G., Vance, E.R. and McCarthy, G.J., Mater. Res. Bull., 16, 627 (1981)Google Scholar
4. Vance, E.R., Bali, C.J., Day, R.A., Smith, K.L., Blackford, M.G., Begg, B.D. and Angel, P.J., J. Alloys and Compounds, in press,(1994).Google Scholar
5. Vance, E.R., Angel, P.J., Begg, B.D. and Day, R.A., in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol 333, edited by Ewing, R.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1994), p. 293.Google Scholar
6. Kesson, S.E., Sinclair, W.J. and Ringwood, A.E., Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage., 3, 259 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Brauer, V.G. and Kristen, H., Z. anorg. allg. Chem., 456, 41 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Keller, C. and Walter, K.H., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 27, 1253 (1965).Google Scholar
9. Matzke, H.J., Toscano, E., Walker, C.T. and Solomah, A.G., Adv. Ceram. Mater., 3, 285 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Seaborg, G.T., Radiochimica Acta, 61, 115 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Vance, E.R., Begg, B.D., Day, R.A., Angel, P.J., Moricca, S.S. and Fisher, C.A.J., in Austceram ‘92, edited by Bannister, J.M. (CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 1992), p. 1034 Google Scholar