Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:34:23.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Z-contrast Imaging and EELS of Dislocation Cores at the Si/GaAs Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

S. Lopatin ,
G. Duscher ,
S. J. Pennycook  and
M. F. Chisholm
S. Lopatin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, NCSU, Raleigh NC 27695
G. Duscher
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, NCSU, Raleigh NC 27695 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
S. J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
M. F. Chisholm
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Solid State Division, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

The interface between silicon and epitaxial GaAs thin film grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition was studied using atomic-resolution Z-contrast imaging. Z-contrast imaging provides chemical composition information and allows direct interpretation of micrographs. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) yields correlation between structure and chemistry. Different types of dislocation were identified at the Si/GaAs interface. Atomic structure of non-reconstructed 90° dislocation (exhibiting a dangling bond) is refined by means of computer simulations based on functional density theory. EELS form planar Si/GaAs interface and dislocation cores obtained and analyzed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 744: Symposium M – Progress in Semiconductors II–Electronic and Optoelectronic Applications , 2002 , M1.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fang, S.F., Adomi, K., Iyer, S., Morkoc, H., Zabel, H., Choi, C., and Otsuka, N., J. Appl. Phys. 68 (7), R31 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Mahajan, S., Acta Mater. 48, 137 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Lopatin, S., Pennycook, S. J., Narayan, J. and Duscher, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (15), 2728 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Pennycook, S.J., Jesson, D.E., Phys. Rev. Lett 64 (8), 938 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Pennycook, S.J., Browning, N.D., Jesson, D.E., Chisholm, M.F., and McGibbon, A.J., Appl. Phys. A 57, 385 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Williams, D. B. and Carter, C. B., Transmission electron microscopy: a textbook for materials science, Plenum Press, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
7. Nellist, P. D., Pennycook, S.J., Ultramicroscopy 78, 111 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Maiti, A., Chisholm, M. F., Pennycook, S. J., and Pantelides, S. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (7), 1306 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Chisholm, M. F., Maiti, A., Pennycook, S. J., and Pantelides, S. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1), 132 (1998).Google Scholar