Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:01:33.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Diffuse Scattering from Misfit Dislocation at Buried Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Kaile Li
Affiliation:
Dept. Physics and Astronomy, U. Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
Paul F. Miceli
Affiliation:
Dept. Physics and Astronomy, U. Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
Christian Lavoie
Affiliation:
Dept. Physics and Astronomy, U. British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaV6T 1Z1
Tom Tiedje
Affiliation:
Dept. Physics and Astronomy, U. British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaV6T 1Z1
Karen L. Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Dept. Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CanadaV5A 1S6
Get access

Abstract

Motivated by x-ray scattering experiments on heteroepitaxially grown thin films, we present model calculations of the diffuse x-ray scattering arising from misfit dislocations. The model is based on the elastic displacements from dislocations whose positions are spatially uncorrelated. These numerical results give support to a phenomenological model [Phys. Rev. B 51, 5506 (1995)] that predicts the scaling of diffuse scattering intensity with perpendicular wavevector, Qz. At low Qz the diffuse width scales inversely with the defect size, which is given by the film thickness due to the effect of the elastic image field, whereas at high Qz the diffuse width is mosaic-like, scaling with Qz. New experimental results for InxGa1−xAs/GaAs are also presented and compared to the model. The calculations are in good agreement with these experiments, as well as other measurements in the literature for high and low dislocation density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Krivoglaz, M. A., Theory of X-ray and Thermal Neutron Scattering by Real Crystals (Plenum, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
2. Holý, V., Kubena, J., Abramof, E., Lischka, K., Pesek, A., and Koppensteiner, E., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1736 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Kaganer, V. M., Köhler, R., Schmidbauer, M., Opitz, R.., Jenichen, B., Phys. Rev. B 55, 1793 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Miceli, P.F., Palmstrøm, C. J., Phys. Rev. B 51, 5506 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Miceli, P.F., Weatherwax, J., Krentsel, T., Palmstrøm, C. J., Physica B 221, 230 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Li, K. and Miceli, P. F., to be published.Google Scholar
7. Lavoie, C., Pinnington, T., Tiedje, T., Goldman, R.S., Kavanagh, K. L., Hutter, J. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3744 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Kavanagh, K. L., Capano, M. A, and Hobbs, L. W., Barbour, J. C., Marée, P. M. J., Schaff, W., Mayer, J. W., Pettit, D., Woodall, J. M., Stroscio, J. A., and Feenstra, R. M., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 4843 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Gibaud, A., McMorrow, D. F. and Swaddling, P. P., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, 2645 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Reimer, P. M., Zabel, H., Flynn, C. P. and Dura, J.A.. Journal of Crystal Growth 127, 643 (1993). P. M. Reimer, private communication.Google Scholar