Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:27:03.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Diffraction Study of Phase Formation and Growth in Nitrogen Implanted Iron: Temperature Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. J. Arnott
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
F. C. Burns
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
L. G. Carreiro
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
D. R. Chiphan
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
W. J. Croft
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
E. A. Johnson
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
J. V. Marzik
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
P. L. Sagalyn
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory, Bldg 292, Watertown, MA, 02172
Get access

Abstract

We report preliminary results from an ongoing study of iron nitride grains formed in high purity iron under nitrogen ion bombardment. Under various implantation conditions, different iron nitride phases grow large enough to produce sharp x-ray diffraction lines. We have used these lines to examine the influence of target temperature during implantation. Between 200°C and 400°C increasing target temperature, which enhances dopant mobility, reduces the retained dose of nitrogen and restricts the formation of nitride phases. Over this temperature range, however, increasing vacancy mobility favors the growth of nitride grains and x-ray line breadth data suggests an optimum temperature for growth of Fe4N grains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Dearnaley, G., Rad. Effects 63, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
2 Hubler, G., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B7/8, 151 (1985).Google Scholar
3 Longworth, G. and Hartley, N.E.W., Thin Solid Films, 48, 95 (1978).Google Scholar
4 Rauschenbach, B. and Kolitsch, A., Phys. Stat. Sol. 80, 211 (1983).Google Scholar
5 Rauschenbach, B. and Hohmuth, K., Cryst. Res. and Tech, 19, 1425 (1984).Google Scholar
6 Fayeulle, S., Treheux, D., and Esnouf, C., Nucl. Inst. and Meth., B7/8, 171Google Scholar
7 McCamy, J.W., Godbole, M.J., Pedraza, A.J., and Lowndes, D.H., J. Mater. Res. 1, 629 (1986).Google Scholar
8 Johnson-Matthey Chemical Co, LTD, Aesar cat. no. 10866.Google Scholar
9 Denholm, A.S. and Wittkower, A.B., Nucl. Inst. and Meth., B6, 88 (1985).Google Scholar
10 Tracor Northern Corp., Middleton, WI (1986).Google Scholar
11 Rauschenbach, B., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B15, 725 (1986).Google Scholar
12 Armini, A.J., Int. Workshop on MeV Ion Imp., August, 1987, (Salem, MA), to be published.Google Scholar
13 Matsunami, et al, Atom. Data and Nucl. Data Tables, 31, 1 (1984).Google Scholar
14 Atwater, H.A., Smith, H.I., and Thompson, C.V., in Beam-Solid Interactions and Phase Transformalions, ed. Kurz, H., Olson, G.L., and Poate, J.M. (Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1986) pp. 337342 Google Scholar
15 Atwater, H.A., Thompson, C.V., and Smith, H.I., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. A. (A3.8), Boston, MA, December, 1986.Google Scholar