Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:41:32.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Analysis of Alpha Mercuric Iodide Crystal Structure and Processing Effects*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

L. Keller ,
E.X. Wang  and
A.Y. Cheng
L. Keller
Affiliation:
CAMET Research, Inc., Goleta, CA 93117
A.Y. Cheng
Affiliation:
EG&G Energy Measurements Inc., Santa Barbara Operations, Goleta, CA 93117
Get access

Abstract

X-ray topography and rocking curve experiments were performed on α-mercuric iodide samples. As-grown crystals were examined for intrinsic defects and crystallinity. Orientation of certain defects depends on the direction of crystal growth. The propagation of as-grown crystalline features was documented. The extent of crystal damage introduced during various steps of device fabrication such as sawing, polishing, etching and contact deposition was explored. Coefficients of linear thermal expansion of α33 = 54 ± 5 (10−6/°C) along the tetragonal c-axis, \001] direction and ±ll = 11 ± 4 (10−6/°C) in the \100] direction were measured.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 302: Symposium F – Semiconductors for Room-Temperature Radiation Detector Applications , 1993 , 153
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC08-88-NV10617. Note: By acceptance of this article, the publisher and/or recipient acknowledges the U.S. Government's right to retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering this paper. Reference to a company or product name does not imply approval or recommendation of the product by the U.S. Department of Energy to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

References

REFERENCES

1. Skinner, N.L., Ortale, C., Schieber, M.M., and Berg, L. van den, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A283, 119 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Gits, S., Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 213, 43 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Schieber, M. M., Ortale, M., Berg, L. van den, Schnepple, W. F., Keller, L., Wagner, C.N.J., Yelon, W., Ross, F., Georgeson, G. and Milstein, F., Nucl. Instrum. Methods. 283, 172 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Boettinger, W.J., Burdette, H.E. and Kurlyama, M., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 47(8), 906 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Slack, G.A. and Bartram, S.F., J. Appl. Phys., 46(1), 89 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gauthier, S. and Nlcolau, I.F., J. Appl. Cryst., 15, 46 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hausslhil, S. and Scholz, H., Kristall Tech., 10, 1175(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Prokopovich, Y. A., Uzhgorod Derzh Univ. Uzhgorod, USSR Deposited Doc. VINITI, No. 1700–74, 139 (1974).Google Scholar
9. Nicolau, I.F. and Rolland, G., Mat. Res. Bull., 16, 759 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Plechotka, M. and Kaldis, E., Report to European Space Agency, ESA Contract #5943/84/FL, (1987).Google Scholar
11. Schieber, M.M., Private communication, (1987).Google Scholar
12. NBS Monograph 25, Sect. 7, Standard X-ray Diffraction Patterns, 32 (1969).Google Scholar
13. Bond, W.L., Acta Cryst., A13, 814 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar