Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:58:03.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Xps and Xrd Studies of Uranium Rich Minerals from Cigar Lake, Saskatchewan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

S. Sunder ,
P. Taylor  and
J. J. Cramer
S. Sunder
Affiliation:
Division of Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba ROE 1LO
P. Taylor
Affiliation:
Division of Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba ROE 1LO
J. J. Cramer
Affiliation:
Division of Geochemistry and Waste Immobilization, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba ROE 1LO
Get access

Abstract

Samples of uranium ore from the 1,300 million year old Cigar Lake deposits in northern Saskatchewan have been investigated using X ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and X ray Diffraction (XRD). The XPS spectra showed the peaks for U, Pb, 0, C, Si, Ca and Mg. Analysis of highresolution XPS spectra showed that the oxidation state of uranium in these minerals is equal to, or lower than, that of U3O7. The XRD data confirm the presence of an oxidized phase, most likely α U3O7., in addition to UO2. The low U(VI)/U(IV) ratio in these minerals is consistent with the low uranium concentration found in groundwater in contact with these uranium minerals. The relevance of these results to the disposal concept of used nuclear fuel in the Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Program is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 465
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Skippen, G. B. and Toth, J., 1984. Geoscience Canada,11 76 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D. W., Bailey, M. G., Stanchell, F. W. and McIntyre, N. S., J. Electroanal. Chem. 130, 163 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Shoesmith, D. W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M. G., Wallace, G. J. and Stanchell, F. W., Applic. of Surf. Sci. 20, 39 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D. W., Johnson, L. H., Wallace, G. J., Bailey, M. G. and Snaglewski, A. P. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, Edited by Bates, J. K. and Seefeldt, W. B., Material Research Soc. Symposia Proc. 84, pp. 103–112 (1986)Google Scholar
5. Cramer, J. J., 1986, in Proceedings of Second International Conf. Radioactive Waste Management, (Canadian Nuclear Soc. Publishers, Toronto, 1986) p. 697.Google Scholar
6. Fouques, J. P., Fowler, M., Knipping, H. D., and Schimann, K., Can. Inst. Mining, Bull, U.79, p. 70, (1986)Google Scholar
7. Wagner, C. D., Riggs, W. M., Davis, L. E., Moulder, J. F. and Muilerberg, G. E., Handbook of X ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin Elmer. Corporation Physical Electronics Division, Eden Praire, Minnesota, U.S.A., 1979.Google Scholar
8. McIntyre, N. S., Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D. W. and Stanchell, F. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 714 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hoekstra, H. R., Santoro, A. and Siegel, S., J. Inorgan. Nucl. Chem. 18, 166 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. George, E., Pagel, M., Dusausoy, Y. and Gautier, J. M., Uranium 3, 69 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Cramer, J. J., Vilks, P. and Larocque, J. P. A. (in preparation), Near field Analog Features from the Cigar Lake Uranium Deposit in Proc. Comp. Europ. Com. Symposium on Natural Analogues in Radioactive Waste Disposal, Brussels, April 28 30, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Parks, G. A., and Pohl, D. C., Hydrothermal Solubility of Uraninite U.S.A. Department of Energy Report DOE/ER12016 1 (1985).Google Scholar
13. , Cramer, J.J. unpublished results.Google Scholar
14. Wagman, D. D., Evans, W. H., Parker, V. B., Schumm, R. H., Halow, I., Bailey, S. M., Churney, K. L., and Nuttall, R. L.. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol.11, Supp. 2, 1982 p. 392.Google Scholar
15. Garrels, R. M. and Christ, C. L., Solutions, Minerals, and Equilibria, Harper and Row, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
16. Lyon, R. B., Status of the Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Program, Atomic Energy of Canada report, AECL 8395 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Pagel, M., Poty, B. and Sheppard, S.M.F., in Uranium in the Pine Creek Geosyncline, edited by Ferguson, J. and Goleky, A. G.. Proc. Int. Uranium Symp. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 639–654 (1980).Google Scholar
18. Fritz, P. and Frape, S. K., Chem. Geol. 36, 179 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar