Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:54:30.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wipp Waste Package Testing on Simulated DHLW: Emplacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Martin A. Molecke*
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Div. 6332, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

Several series of simulated (nonradioactive) defense high-level waste (DHLW) package tests have recently been emplaced in the WIPP, a research and development facility authorized to demonstrate the safe disposal of defense-related wastes. The primary purpose of these 3-to-7 year duration tests is to evaluate the in situ materials performance of waste package barriers (canisters, overpacks, backfills, and nonradioactive DHLW glass waste form) for possible future application to a licensed waste repository in salt. This paper describes all test materials, instrumentation, and emplacement and testing techniques, and discusses progress of the various tests.

These tests are intended to provide information on materials behavior (i.e., corrosion, metallurgical and geochemical alterations, waste form durability, surface interactions, etc.), as well as comparison between several waste package designs, fabrications details, and actual costs.These experiments involve 18 full-size simulated DHLW packages (approximately 3.0 m x 0.6 m diameter) emplaced in vertical boreholes in the salt drift floor. Six of the test packages contain internal electrical heaters (470 W/canister), and were emplaced under approximately reference DHLW repository conditions. Twelve other simulated DHLW packages were emplaced tinder accelerated-aging or overtest conditions, including the artificial introduction of brine, and a thermal loading approximately three to four times higher than reference. Eight of these 12 test packages contain 1500 W/canister electrical heaters; the other four are filled with DHLW glass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Molecke, M. A., Test Plan: Waste Package Performance Technology Experiments for Simulated DHLW, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (June 1984).Google Scholar
2. Molecke, M. A. and Matalucci, R. V., Preliminary Requirements for the Emplacement and Retrieval of DHLW Tests in the WIPP, SAND84–1444, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (October 1984).Google Scholar
3. Baxter, R. G., Description of Defense Waste Processing Facility Reference Waste Form and Canister, DP-1606, Rev 1, Savannah River Plant, Aiken, SC (August 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Matalucci, R. V., Christensen, C. L., Hunter, T. O., Molecke, M. A., and Munson, D. E., Waste Isoloation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Research and Development Program: In Situ Testing Plan), SAND81–2628, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1982).Google Scholar
5. Molecke, M. A., Ruppen, J. A., and Diegle, R. B., Material for HighLevel Waste Canister/Overpacks in Salt Formations, Nuclear Technology, Vol.63, 476506 (December 1983).Google Scholar
6. Westinghouse Electric Corp, Waste Technology Services Division, Waste Package Reference Conceptual Designs for a Repository in Salt, WTSD-TME-001 (prepared for, and available from, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Columbus, OH)(August 1983).Google Scholar
7. Westinghouse Electric Corp, Advance Energy Systems Division, Engineered Waste Package Conceptual Design: Defense High-Level Waste (Form 1), Commercial High-Level Waste (Form 1), and Spent Fuel (Form 2) Disposal in Salt, ONWI-438, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Columbus, OH (April 1983). (Formerly printed as AESD-TME-3131, September 1982.)Google Scholar
8. Molecke, M. A. and Torres, T. M., The Waste Package Materials Field Test in SE New Mexico Salt, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, ed, McVay, G. L., NorthHolland (1984).Google Scholar
9. Shefelbine, H. C., Summary Report, Brine Migration, SAND82–0152, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1982).Google Scholar