Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:45:20.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Can we Learn from off-Specular Neutron Reflection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Roger Pynn
Roger Pynn*
Affiliation:
Manuel Lujan, Jr. Neutron Scattering Center; Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access

Abstract

This paper provides a brief introduction to the subject of off-specular neutron scattering by rough interfaces. Such scattering can be calculated using the distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) in which the neutron wavefunctions for a system with smooth interfaces are used as the basis for perturbation theory. Although it has been applied successfully to model the scattering from rough surfaces, the DWBA has several quantitative and qualitative limitations, some of which are described in this paper. When it is applied to multilayer systems, the DWBA correctly predicts a number of qualitative features of the diffuse scattering, including fringes of scattering that result from correlations between the roughnesses of neighbouring interfaces. A remarkable feature of diffuse neutron reflection is the range of length scales within a surface or interface that is probed. This is illustrated here by data obtained with a self-assembled multilayer of organic molecules where distances between 500 Å and 3 μm parallel to the layers are probed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 376: Symposium BB – Neutron Scattering in Materials Science , 1994 , 165
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Sinha, S. K., Sirota, E. B., Garoff, S., and Stanley, H. B., Phys. Rev. B 38, 2297 (1988)Google Scholar
2 Pynn, R., Phys. Rev. B 45, 602 (1992)Google Scholar
3 Weber, W. and Lengeler, B., Phys. Rev. B 46, 7593 (1992)Google Scholar
4 Bahr, D., private communicationGoogle Scholar
5 de Boer, D. K. G., Phys. Rev. B 49, 5817 (1994)Google Scholar
6 Pynn, R. and Baker, S. M., Physica B 198, 1, (1994)Google Scholar
7 Holy, V., Kubena, J., Ohlidal, I., and Lischka, K., Phys. Rev., B 47, 15896 (1993)Google Scholar
8 LANSCE Newsletter number 14 (published by Los Alamos National Laboratory)Google Scholar
9 Felcher, G. P., Goyette, R. J., Anastasiadis, S., Russell, T. P., Foster, M., and Bates, F., (Preprint)Google Scholar
10 Schlomka, J-P., Tolan, M., Schwalowsky, L., Seeck, O. H., Stettner, J., and Press, W., Phys. Rev. (in press)Google Scholar
11 These data were taken by G. S. Smith using the SPEAR reflectometer at LANSCE.Google Scholar