Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:47:46.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Vault Model for the Assessment of Used Fuel Disposal in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

N. C. Garisto  and
D. M. Leneveu
N. C. Garisto
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE 1LO
D. M. Leneveu
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada ROE 1LO
Get access

Abstract

The environmental assessment of the geological disposal of used nuclear fuel involves the assimilation of experimental results to produce an estimate of the potential impact of a disposal vault on man and the environment. In this paper we briefly outline the assessment methodology and expand upon one aspect of the data assimilation process, namely, the incorporation of research results on the performance of engineered barriers into assessment models.

The model to be discussed represents (i) failure modes for titaniumbased containers, including short-term failures due to undetected manufacturing defects and long-term failures due to uniform and local corrosion; (ii) release of radionuclides from used fuel, including relatively fast release of soluble fission products from gap and grain boundaries and slow, congruent release controlled by the dissolution of the fuel matrix itself; and (iii) mass transport of released radionuclides through the clay-based sealing materials surrounding the waste container, including diffusion, convection and radionuclide storage (sorption or retardation) effects.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 313
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dormuth, K.W., and Lyon, R.B., “The Link between Detailed Process Models and Simplified Models,” Proc. 2nd NEA Workshop on System Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal, Paris. October (1985).Google Scholar
2. Garisto, N.C., “Modelling Aspects in Vault Chemistry,” in Proc. Second Int. Conf. Radioactive Waste Management, pp. 712–714. Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, (1986).Google Scholar
3. Hancox, W.T., “Progress in the Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Program,” in Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Radioactive Waste Management, pp. 1–9. Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, (1986).Google Scholar
4. LeNeveu, D.M., “Vault Submodel for the Second Interim Assessment of the Canadian Concept for Nuclear Fuel Waste Disposal: Post-Closure Phase,” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-8383 (1986).Google Scholar
5. LeNeveu, D.M., Ann. Nucl. Energy 14, 77 (1987).Google Scholar
6. LeNeveu, D.M. and Garisto, N.C., “Sensitivity Surfaces for the Predictive Assessment of Waste Package Performance,” submitted to the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management Symposium, Boston (1987).Google Scholar
7. LeNeveu, D.M., unpublished results.Google Scholar
8. Nuttall, K., Can. Metal. Quart. 22 403 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Doubt, G., “Assessing Reliability and Useful Life of Containers for Disposal of Irradiated Fuel Waste,” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-8328 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Molecke, M.A. and Abrego, L., “Status of SANDIA HLW Canister/Overpack Program Studies,” Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND-80–2191C, (1980).Google Scholar
11. Molecke, M.A., Ruppen, J.A. and Diegle, R., Nucl. Tech. 63, 476 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Sorenson, N.R. and Diegle, R.B., “Corrosion Research of Alloys for Use in Nuclear Waste Disposal Containers,” in The Corrosion Performance of Nuclear Fuel Waste Containers, pp. 31–40, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-340 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Mathers, W.G., “HOTROCK, A Program for Calculating the Transient Temperature Field from an Underground Nuclear Waste Disposal Vault,” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-336 (1985).Google Scholar
14. McKay, P. and Mitton, D.B., Corrosion NACE 41, 52 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Clarke, C.F., Hardie, D. and McKay, P., Corrosion Science, 26, 425 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Shimogori, K., Sato, H. and Tomari, H., J. Japan Inst. Metals 42, 567 (1978).Google Scholar
17. Kobayshi, M., Araya, Y., Fujiyama, S., Sunayama, Y. and Uno, H., “Study on Crevice Corrosion of Titanium,” in Titanium '80 Science and Technology, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Titanium, pp. 2613–2622. The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA (1980).Google Scholar
18. Sato, H., Kamikubo, F. and Shimogori, K., “Effect of Gasket Materials on Crevice Corrosion of Titanium,” in Titanium '84, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Titanium, Munich, FRG, September 10–14, 1984, edited by Lutjering, G., Zwicker, U. and Bunk, W. (1985).Google Scholar
19. Bailey, M.G., Ikeda, B.M., Cann, D. and Shoesmith, D.W., “Crevice Corrosion of Titanium Grade-2 under Nuclear Waste Disposal Vault Conditions,” to be published in Proc. Int. Conf. Localized Corrosion, Orlando, Florida, June 1–5 (1987).Google Scholar
20. Ikeda, B.M. and Clarke, C.F., “Titanium Corrosion under Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Disposal Conditions,” in Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Radioactive Waste Management, pp. 605–610, Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto (1986).Google Scholar
21. Westerman, R.E. and Telander, M.R., “Hydrogen Absorption and Crevice Corrosion Behaviour of Ti Grade 12 during Exposure to Irradiated Brine at 150°C″ in Waste Management '87, Volume 2, pp. 463–469. University of Arizona, Tucson (1987).Google Scholar
22. Garisto, N.C., Harvey, K.B., Garisto, F. and Johnson, L.H., “Source Term Models for the Assessment of Nuclear Fuel Waste Disposal in Canada,” in Waste Management '86, Volume 2, p. 397. University of Arizona, Tucson (1986).Google Scholar
23. Garisto, F. and Garisto, N.C., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 90, 103 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Garisto, N.C. and Garisto, F., Ann. Nucl. Energy 13, 591 (1986).Google Scholar
25. Garisto, F., Chem. Eng. Sci. 41, 3219 (1986).Google Scholar
26. Garisto, N.C., Vance, E.R., Stroes-Gascoyne, S. and Johnson, L.H., “Instant Release Fractions for the Assessment of Used Nuclear Fuel Disposal,” in preparation.Google Scholar
27. Bailey, M.G., Johnson, L.H. and Shoesmith, D.W., Corrosion Sci. 25, 233 (1985).Google Scholar
28. Garisto, F., unpublished results.Google Scholar
29. Lemire, R.J., “Effects of High Ionic Strength Groundwaters on Calculated Equilibrium Concentrations in the Uranium-Water System,” Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, in preparation.Google Scholar
30. Eriksen, T.E. and Jacobsson, A., “Diffusion in Clay-Experimental Techniques and Theoretical Models,” KBS Report, KBS-84–05 (1984).Google Scholar
31. Skagius, K. and Neretnieks, I., “Diffusion Measurements of Cesium and Strontium in Biotite Gneiss,” KBS Report, KBS-85–15 (1985).Google Scholar
32. Lever, D.A. “Some Notes on Experiments Measuring Diffusion of Sorbed Nuclides through Porous Media,” Harwell Laboratory Report, AERE R.12321 (1986).Google Scholar
33. Torstenfelt, B. “Migration of Fission Products and Actinides in Compacted Bentonite,” KBS Report 86–14 (1986).Google Scholar
34. Cheung, S.C.H., “Evaluation of the Methodologies for Determining Ionic Diffusion Coefficients in Clays.” To be published in Proc. CSCE Centennial Conf., May 1987, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
35. Gillham, R.W., Robin, M.J.L. and Dytynyshyn, D.J., Can. Geotech. J. 21, 541 (1984).Google Scholar
36. Gillham, R.W., Johnston, H.M., Robin, M.J.L. and Sharma, H.D., “Diffusion of Radionuclides in Buffer and Backfill Materials,” in Proceedings of the Nineteenth Information Meeting of the Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Program, pp. 448–464. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-350 (1985).Google Scholar
37. Liebetrau, A.M., Apted, M.J., Engel, D.W., Altenhofen, M.K., Reid, C.R., Strachan, D.M., Erikson, R.L. and Alexander, D.H., “AREST: A Probabilistic Source-Term Code for Waste Package Performance Analysis,” in Waste Management '87, Volume 2, pp. 535–544. University of Arizona, (1987).Google Scholar