Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:01:23.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of a Nuclear Waste Repository Performance Assessment Model:Comparison of Theory With Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. W. Geldart ,
B. P. Mcgrail ,
K. C. Rhoads  and
M. J. Apted
R. W. Geldart
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
B. P. Mcgrail
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
K. C. Rhoads
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
M. J. Apted
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Laboratory tests were conducted to validate a radionuclide mass transfer model. During the experiments, cesium and uranium releases from a simulated waste form embedded in an isotropic medium of quartz sand were measured. A 0.01 M NaH2PO4 buffer solution flowed past the waste form. Downstream concentrations obtained from computer simulations were compared with experimentally measured concentrations of cesium and uranium. Uranium release was found to be controlled by solubility-limited mass transfer, while cesium release was controlled by waste form dissolution kinetics. It was also found that the effects of dissolution on groundwater chemistry must be coupled with solubility-limited mass transfer models to defensibly predict radionuclide release rates under realistic repository conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 341
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Macedo, P. B., Barkatt, A., and Simmons, J. H., Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage. 3, 13 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chambré, P. L., Pigford, T. H., Fujita, A., Kanki, T., Kobayashi, A., Lung, H., Ting, D., Sato, Y., and Zavoshy, S. J., Analytical Performance Models for Geologic Repositories, Vol II, LBL–1482, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories, Berkeley, California (1982).Google Scholar
3. Chambré, P. L., Pigford, T. H., Lee, W. W.-L., Ahn, J., Kajiwara, S., Kim, C. L., Kimura, H., Lung, H., Williams, W. J., and Zavoshy, S. J., Mass Transfer and Transport in a Geologic Environment, LBL-19430, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. McGrail, B. P., Chick, L. A., and McVay, G. L., Nuc. Tech. 69, 114–118 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Silva, R. J. and Yee, A. W., Earth Sciences Division Annual Report, LBL-13600, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California (1981).Google Scholar
6. Materials Characterization Center, Test Methods Submitted for Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, PNL-3990, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington (1981).Google Scholar
7. Rimstidt, J. D. and Barnes, H. L., Geochim. Cosmochim. 44, 1683–1699 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Scheidegger, A. E., The Physics of Flow Through Porous Media, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada (1974).Google Scholar
9. Sagar, B., Eslinger, P. W., and Baca, R. G., Nuc. Tech., 75, 338–349 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Saltelli, A., Avogadro, A., and Bidoglio, G., Nuc. Tech., 67, 245–254 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar