Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:44:39.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tribological Properties of Iron Powder Subjected to Various Surface Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. Meurk
Affiliation:
Institute for Surface Chemistry, PO Box 5607, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
I. Larson
Affiliation:
Institute for Surface Chemistry, PO Box 5607, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
L. Bergström
Affiliation:
Institute for Surface Chemistry, PO Box 5607, 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The role of organic additives in dry pressing of metallic powders can be studied with the atomic force microscope (AFM) in terms of interaction forces, friction forces and shearing behavior. Material dependent properties in contact can be determined with the appropriate calibration of instrument sensitivities and spring constants. Force-distance curves give information about particle-particle interactions; measurement of static and dynamic friction provide additional information directly related to surface deformation. We present a fast and simple method for calibration of lateral cantilever deflection, independent of experimental setup. Experimental results on iron surfaces in contact show how adsorption of 12-hydroxy stearic acid yields different contact behaviour than commercial lubricants. This information also explains the hysteresis in friction-load experiments which can not be obtained from normal force curves or standard friction measurements alone.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. German, R. M., Powder Metallurgy Science, 2nd ed. (Metal Powder Industries Federation, New Jersey, 1994).Google Scholar
2. Mate, C. M., McClelland, G. M., Erlandsson, R. and Chiang, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1942 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Mitsuya, Y., Ohshima, Y. and Nonogaki, T, Wear 211, 198 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Putman, C., Igarashi, M. and Kaneko, R., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, L 264 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Ogletree, D. F., Carpick, R. W. and Salmeron, M., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67 (9), 3298 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Carpick, R. W., Ogletree, D. F. and Salmeron, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (12), 1548 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Lantz, M. A., O'Shea, S. J., Hoole, A. C. F. and Welland, M. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 (8), 970 (1997).Google Scholar