Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:30:13.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tribological and Mossbauer Studies of Ion-Implanted Iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D. L. Williamson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401
Yi Qu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401
Ronghua Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
W. S. Sampath
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
P. J. Wilbur
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access

Abstract

A modified pin-on-disc wear test technique and conversion electron Mössbauer spectroscopy (CEMS) have been used to characterize the tribological and microstructural properties, respectively, of pure Fe implanted with N and Ar ions at high current densities. CEMS measurements were made before and after wear testing. For the lubricated, mild adhesive wear conditions used here, no evidence was found for iron-nitride dissolution or N atom migration. Disordering of γ'-Fe4N did occur as a result of the wear process. All Nimplanted surfaces were tribologically superior to the Ar-implanted surface and an extremely wear-resistant surface layer about 30–50 nm thick was produced with a dose of 8×1016 N atoms/cm2, at a dose rate of 100 μA/cm2. However, once this layer was worn away the wear rate returned sharply to that of unimplanted pure Fe. A high retained N dose has been observed even for a dose rate of 750 μA/cm2 during which the sample reached 280°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dearnaley, G., Mater. Sci. Engr. 69, 139 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Singer, I.L., Applic. Surf. Sci. 18, 28 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Herman, H., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 182/183, 887 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Wilbur, P.J. and Daniels, L.O., Vacuum 36, 5 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Wilbur, P.J., Wei, R., and Sampath, W.S., in Surface Modification of Metals by Ion Beams, Riva del Garda, Italy (1988, in press).Google Scholar
6. Lim, S.M. and Ashby, M.F., Acta Metall. 35, 1 (1987).10.1016/0001-6160(87)90209-4Google Scholar
7. Suh, N.P., Wear 44, 1 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Shepard, S.P. and Suh, N.P., J. Lubric. Technol. 104, 29 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Williamson, D.L., Kustas, F.M., Fobare, D.F., and Misra, M.S., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 1493 (1986).Google Scholar
10. Mössbauer Effect Reference and Data Journal, edited by Stevens, J.G., Stevens, V.E., and Gettys, W.L. (Mossbauer Effect Data Center, Asheville 19781988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wreidt, H.A., Gokcen, N.A., and Nafziger, R. H., Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams, 8 355 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Fayeulle, S., Wear 107, 61 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Pollock, J.T.A., Clissold, R.A., Paterson, P.J., and Veitch, C.J., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B19/20, 263 (1987).Google Scholar