Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:33:15.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transparent ZnTe:Cu contacts for bifacial characterization of CdTe solar cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Darshini Desai
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Steven Hegedus
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Brian McCandless
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Daniel Ryan
Affiliation:
Institute of Energy Conversion, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716
Get access

Abstract

Cu-doped ZnTe films grown by galvanic deposition were developed to provide transparent ohmic contacts to CdTe solar cells. Control of the Cu doping with triethanolamine was critical to limit the free Cu in order to achieve high transparency (>60% in the visible) and to minimize shunting. Devices with ZnTe:Cu contacts had comparable performance to devices with Cu/Au or Cu/graphite contacts, achieving Voc of 0.79 V and fill factor (FF) of 68% for standard front illumination. Bifacial spectral response (SR) measurements, through front and back contacts, were analyzed and yielded a diffusion length (L) of 0.8 μm and depletion width (W) of 2.5 μm. Backwall SR measurements made through the transparent ZnTe contact are much more sensitive to L and W than are measurements for standard front illumination. ZnTe:Cu is a promising material for bifacial characterization as well as tandem cell interconnects and more stable Cu-doped contacts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gessert, T., Duda, A., Asher, S., Narayanswamy, C., Rose, D., Proc. 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., 654 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Mahawala, P., Vakkalanka, S., Jeedugunta, S., Ferekides, C. S., presented at Proc. 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. (2005), to be published.Google Scholar
3 Phillips, J., Proc. 21th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., 782 (1990).Google Scholar
4 Mondal, A., McCandless, B., Birkmire, R., Solar Energy Mat. Solar Cells 26, 181 (1992).Google Scholar
5 McCandless, B., Sites, J., Chapter 14 in Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, ed Luque, s. A. and Hegedus, S., J. Wiley and Sons (2003).Google Scholar
6 Dobson, K., Visoly-Fisher, I., Hodes, G., Cahen, D., Solar Energy Mat. Solar Cells 62, 295 (2000).Google Scholar
7 McCandless, B., Buchanan, W., Birkmire, R., presented at 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. (2005), to be published.Google Scholar
8 McCandless, B., Hegedus, S., Birkmire, R., Cunningham, D., Thin Solid Films 431-432, 248 (2003).Google Scholar
9 Hegedus, S., Ryan, D., Dobson, K., McCandless, B., Desai, D., MRS Symp. Proc. 763, 447 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Hegedus, S., McCandless, B., Birkmire, R., Proc. 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., 535 (2000).Google Scholar
11 Gessert, T. et al. , Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf., 419 (1997).Google Scholar