Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:19:28.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of CoPt(001) and FePt(001) Films Formed from Epitaxial Co/Pt and Fe/Pt Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

MR.M. Visokay
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University, Stanford CA 94305
BM.B. Lairson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University, Stanford CA 94305
B.B. Clemens
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University, Stanford CA 94305
R. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University, Stanford CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy was performed on epitaxial Fe/Pt and Co/Pt [001] oriented multilayers that were sputter deposited onto single crystal [001] MgO. Films were examined as-deposited and after annealing in vacuum. Before annealing, the films had a magnetic easy axis in the plane while after annealing the easy axis was out of the plane. Perpendicular anisotropies of 8× 106 erg/cm3 and 1.9x 107 erg/cm3 were measured for the Fe/Pt and Co/Pt post-annealed films. Large magneto-optic Kerr rotations were also measured, 0.6° and 0.4° for the Fe/Pt and Co/Pt annealed films, respectively. Changes in the magnetic properties were a direct result of the transformation of the multilayer into c axis oriented FePt and CoPt intermetallic compounds upon annealing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lee, C.H., Farrow, R.F.C., Lin, C.J., Marinero, E.E. and Chien, C.J., Phys. Rev. B 42 11384 (1990).Google Scholar
2. McCurrie, R.A. and Gaunt, P., Proc. International Conference on Magnetism, Nottingham, England, p. 780, 1964 Google Scholar
3. Weller, D., Brandie, H., Gorman, G., Lin, C.J. and Notarys, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 2726 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Katayama, T., Sugimoto, T., Suzuki, Y., Hashimoto, M., P.de Haan and Lodder, J.C., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 104–107 1002 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Lairson, B.M., Visokay, M.R., Marinero, E.E., Sinclair, R. and Clemens, B.M., submitted.Google Scholar
6. Lairson, B.M., Visokay, M.R., Sinclair, R. and Clemens, B.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 639 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Lairson, B.M., Visokay, M.R., Sinclair, R. and Clemens, B.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 1390 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Buschow, K.H.J., Ferromagnetic Materials Vol. 4, (Elsevier Science Publishers, 1988).Google Scholar
9. Lairson, B.M. and Clemens, B.M., submitted.Google Scholar
10. Lairson, B.M., Visokay, M.R., Sinclair, R. and Clemens, B.M., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. in press (1993).Google Scholar