Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:53:32.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transitions of Shear Resistance in a Single-Asperity Contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. A. Hurtado
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI-02912
K.-S. Kim
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI-02912
Get access

Abstract

The shear force required to emit circular dislocation loops from the edge of a circular adhesive-contact zone is calculated analytically as a function of contact-zone radii. The emission condition is based on the balance of the configurational force and the Peierls force on a dislocation loop initiated at the edge of the adhesive contact zone. The analysis suggests that there is a transition, for a nanometer-scale single-asperity contact, from concurrent (mobile- dislocation-free) slip to single-dislocation-assisted (SDA) slip. The nanometer-scale friction stress (shear force required for slip/contact area), which experimentally is observed independent of normal loading and contact-zone size, is believed to be the stress required for concurrent slip. The analysis also predicts a second transition from SDA slip to multiple-dislocation-cooperated (MDC) slip at the scale of tens of micrometers in contact size. The friction stress at this large length scale has also been observed experimentally to be independent of normal loading and contact size; however, the friction stress at the nanometer scale is about 30 times that at the scale of tens of micrometers. The analysis is consistent with these experimental observations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1950.Google Scholar
2. Homola, A.M., Israelachvili, J.N., McGuiggan, P.M. and Gee, M.L., Wear 136, p. 65 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Carpick, R.W., Agrait, N., Ogletree, D.F. and Salmeron, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, p.1289 (1996); Langmuir 12, p.3334 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Carpick, R.W., Ogletree, D.F. and Salmeron, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, p.1548 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Lantz, M.A., O'Shea, S.J., Welland, M.E. and Johnson, K.L., Phys. Rev. B 55, p.10776 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Enachescu, M., van den Oetelaar, R.J.A., Carpick, R.W., Ogletree, D.F., Flipse, C.F.J. and Salmeron, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, p.1877 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Meyer, E., Ltithi, R., Howald, L., Bammerlin, M., Guggisberg, M. and Gtintherodt, H.- J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, p.1285 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Hurtado, J.A. and Kim, K.- S., Proc. R. Soc. Lond., submitted.Google Scholar
9. Hirth, J. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, second edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1982.Google Scholar
10. Rice, J.R. and Thomson, R., Phil. Mag. 29, p.73 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Savkoor, A.R., Dry adhesive contact of elastomers, M. Engng dissertation, Tech. University Delft, The Netherlands (1987).Google Scholar
12. Kim, K.-S., McMeeking, R.M. and Johnson, K.L, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46, p.243 (1998).Google Scholar