Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:30:45.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time-Resolved Reflectivity Study of Solid-Phase Epitaxial Regrowth in Relaxed and Strained Si1−xGex Epilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

T. E. Haynes
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
C. Lee
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
K. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access

Abstract

The rate of solid-phase epitaxial regrowth has been studied using time-resolved reflectivity in three different types of SiGe/Si epilayers amorphized by ion implantation. In two of these cases, the alloy epilayer contained either 12% or 20% Ge, and the amorphization depth was greater than the thickness (2000 Å) of the SiGe alloy layer. Time-resolved reflectivity measurements showed that the rate of regrowth was not constant in these two cases, but first decreased after passing the SiGe/Si interface, and then increased. The minimum regrowth rate occurred closer to the SiGe/Si interface in the epilayers with the larger Ge atomic fraction. In the third type of sample, the alloy epilayer thickness was ∼7μm, so that the initial epilayer (15% Ge) had the lattice constant of the bulk alloy. Furthermore, amorphization and regrowth occurred entirely within the relaxed alloy layer. In this case, the regrowth rate was constant. The composition dependence of the regrowth-rate transient in the strained layers is discussed in the context of a ‘critical-thickness’ model of strain relaxation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Paine, D. C., Howard, D. J., Stoffel, N. G., and Horton, J. A., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1023 (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Hong, Q. Z., Zhu, J. G., Mayer, J. W., Xia, W., and Lau, S. S., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 1768 (1992).Google Scholar
[3] Paine, D. C., Evans, N. D., and Stoffel, N. G., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 4278 (1991).Google Scholar
[4] Olson, G. L. and Roth, J. A., Mater. Sci. Reports 3, 1 (1988).Google Scholar
[5] Lee, C., Haynes, T. E., and Jones, K. S., to be published in Applied Physics Letters.Google Scholar
[6] Licoppe, C., Nissim, Y. I., Meriadec, C., and Krauz, P., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 1352 (1986).Google Scholar
[7] Lee, C., Haynes, T. E., and Jones, K. S.- manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
[8] Csepregi, L., Kullen, R. P., Mayer, J. W., and Sigmon, T. W., Solid State Comm. 21, 1019 (1977).Google Scholar