Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:49:33.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three Dimensional Microstructures from Metal Carbonyls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jan-Erik Lind
Affiliation:
Olli Nyrhila
Affiliation:
Electrolux Rapid Development, Aholantie 17, 21290 Rusko, Finland
Juha Kotila
Affiliation:
Electrolux Rapid Development, Aholantie 17, 21290 Rusko, Finland
Tatu Syvanen
Affiliation:
Electrolux Rapid Development, Aholantie 17, 21290 Rusko, Finland
Get access

Abstract

3D-LCVD of nickel and iron carbonyls was studied in order to grow 3-D metal forms under static or scanning Nd:YAG-laser beam. In addition to growth, emphasis was also placed on the prevention of the simultaneous decomposition of carbon monoxide, which interferes with the metal growth process. This was essential, because the fairly high precursor gas pressures of the metal carbonyls are very tempting for the 3D-LCVD. Parameters to be optimized included precursor pressure, laser power, laser scan speed and spot size. In order to optimize the growth parameters, the microstructures of the resulting forms were studied using SEM. Comparison between static and scanning growth is presented with the building philosophy in mind, e.g. whether to build structures layer by layer, from modules or in conjunction with another process to compensate for their shortcomings. The substrates used included steel, graphite and porous bronze.

The results indicated different microstructures for iron and nickel, which were dependent on the total/precursor pressure. In the scanning experiments, nickel produced very thin films of high reflectivity, whereas iron produced a structure which could be described as a crystalline spider's web. The static experiments produced solid rods in the case of nickel, whereas with iron, the rods were hollow, even with same spot sizes. Moreover, an evident change in the microstructure of the nickel forms as a function of pressure was observed. The 3-D growth rate of the static experiments seemed very promising for the forthcoming scanning experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nyrhilä, O., Industrial Use of Direct Metal Laser Sintering, SFF Symp., 1998, Austin, TX (to be published)Google Scholar
2. Lind, J-E., M.Sc. Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Finland, 1998.Google Scholar
3. Trout, W.E., J. Chem. Ed. 14, 453 (1937).Google Scholar
4. Maxwell, J. L., Pegna, J., Messia, D., and DeAngelis, D., in Direct Feedback Control of Gas-Phase Laser-Induced Deposition, edited by Bourell, D.L., Beaman, J.J., Marcus, H.L., Crawford, R.H., and Barlow, J.W. (SFF Symp. Proc., 1996, Austin, TX) pp. 227237.Google Scholar
5. Allen, S.D., Copley, S.M., and Edwards, R.H., Report DOE/ER/45012-01, U.S.C. Center for Laser Studies, June (1984).Google Scholar
6. Allen, S.D., Trigubo, A.B., and Jan, R.Y., in Direct Writing Using Laser Chemical Vapor Deposition, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 17 (1983), pp. 207214.Google Scholar