Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:18:45.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking about Diamond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Marshall Stoneham
A. Marshall Stoneham*
Affiliation:
[email protected], UCL, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom, 0207 679 1377, 0207 679 1360
Get access

Abstract

Diamond is valued mainly as a symbol of power and value (the girl's best friend) and as a solution to many materials processing problems (the engineer's best friend). The 1950s saw both striking developments in diamond synthesis and the beginnings of the rise of silicon as the semiconductor of choice. Since then, silicon has transformed the world. Diamond has reinforced its known roles, and found niches that exploit its special qualities. It is also one of the carbon materials that, in combination, have a variety of superb properties. Could there be bigger opportunities for diamond, more than mere niches, arising from the major social needs: the life sciences, the information technologies, energy, and perhaps others. I attempt to identify areas that might develop formidably.

Keywords

diamondspintronicradiation effects
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 956: Symposium J – Diamond Electronics—Fundamentals to Applications , 2006 , 0956-J01-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stoneham, A M, Nature Materials 3 3 (2004)Google Scholar
2. Cacialli, F. and Stoneham, A. M. J. Phys. Cond. Mater. 14, V9 (2002)Google Scholar
3. Stoneham, A M and Harding, J H Nature Materials 2 77 (2003)Google Scholar
4. Stoneham, A M, Matthews, J R, Ford, I J J Phys Cond Mat 16 S2597 (2004)Google Scholar
5. Banhart, F, Rep Prog Phys 62 1181 Google Scholar
6. Zaiser, M and Banhart, F Phys Rev Lett 79 3680 Google Scholar
7. Roth, J et al 2001 Nuclear Fusion 41 1967 (2001), J Nucl Mat 266–269 51 (1999), Nuclear Fusio 44 L21 (2004); B V Mech, A A Haasz, J W Davis J Appl Phys 84 1655 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Bolt, H et al J Nucl Mat 307–311 43 (2002)Google Scholar
9. Heath, J R and Ratner, M A Phys. Today. 43 (May 2003).Google Scholar
10. Stoneham, A M and Ramos, Marta M D J Phys Cond Mat 13 2411 (2001)Google Scholar
11. Cacialli, F et al Nature Materials 2 160 (2002)Google Scholar
12. Ahn, C H, Triscone, J-M and Mannhert, J Nature 424, 1015 (2003)Google Scholar
13. WILLIAMS, C P and CLEARWATER, S H 2000 “Ultimate zero and One: Computing at the Quantum Frontier” New York: Copernicus (Springer Verlag).Google Scholar
14. Fisher, A. J., Phil. Trans Roy. Soc. A 361, 1441 (2003); Fisher, A. J. Lower Limit on Decoherence Introduced by Entangling Two Spatially-Separated Qubits http://arXiV.org/quantph/ 0211200.Google Scholar
15. Plenio, M B and Knight, P L, Phil Trans Roy Soc 453 2017 (1997)Google Scholar
16 Oort, E van, Manson, N B, Glasbeek, M, J Phys C21 4385 (1988)Google Scholar
17. Charnock, F T and Kennedy, T A, Phys Rev B64 041201 (2001); T A Kennedy, F T Charnock, J S Colton, J E Butler, R C Linares, P J Doering, phys stat sol (b) 233 416 (2002); T A Kennedy, J S Colton, J E Butler, R C Linares, P J Doering, Appl Phys Lett 83 4190 (2003).Google Scholar
18. Jelezko, F and Wrachtrup, J J Phys Cond Matt 30 R1089 (2004); F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, M Domhan, A Gruber, J Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 130501 (2004); L Childress, M V G Dutt, J M Taylor, A S Zibrov, F Jelezko, J Wrachtrup, P R Hemmer and M D Ludkin Science 314 281 (2006); J Wrachtrup and F Jelezko, J. Phys Cond. Mat 18 S807 (2006).Google Scholar
19. Hanson, R., Gywat, O., Awschalom, D. D., Phys. Rev. B 74, 161203 (2006); R. Hanson, F. M. Mendoza, R. J. Epstein, and D. D. Awschalom, Phys Rev Lett 97 087601 (2006)Google Scholar
20. Stoneham, A M, Fisher, A J, Greenland, P T, J Phys Cond Mat 15 L447 (2003); A M Stoneham, phys stat sol (c) 2 25 (2005)Google Scholar