Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:39:28.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thin Film Nanoelectronic Probe for Protein Detection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Rahim Esfandyarpour ,
Mehdi Javanmard ,
Zahra Koochak ,
Hesaam Esfandyarpour ,
James S. Harris  and
Ronald W. Davis
Rahim Esfandyarpour*
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University
Mehdi Javanmard
Affiliation:
Stanford Genome Technology Center; 855 California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
Zahra Koochak
Affiliation:
University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
Hesaam Esfandyarpour
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University
James S. Harris
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University
Ronald W. Davis
Affiliation:
Stanford Genome Technology Center; 855 California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There are many biological macro-molecules such as nucleic acids, lipids, carbohydrates and proteins. While each of them plays a vital (and interesting) part in life but there is something special about the proteins. Proteins are the key link between the processes of information and replication that take place on a genetic level and the infrastructure of living features. Understanding the properties of proteins is the key to understanding the spark of the life. In this paper we describe our study of various electrical properties of protein when performing measurements at the nanoscale. To achieve this goal we designed and fabricated a nanoelectronic probe. This nano structure consists of four thin film layers. There are two conductive layers and an insulative layer in between. There is also a protective oxide layer as the top most layer. This layer is to prevent the exposure of conductive electrodes to the solution. Underneath the bottom electrode, there is another oxide layer, which can be a thermally grown oxide. This layer insulates the first electrode from the substrate. In this study, while we use non-specific detection of streptavidin protein as a proof of concept, we emphasize that the findings of this study can be extended to specific detection of target proteins, where in this case a specific probe molecule would also be immobilized on the sensor surface.

Keywords

nanoscalenanostructurebiomedical
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1572: Symposium SS – Bioelectronics—Materials, Interfaces and Applications , 2013 , mrss13-1572-ss01-10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

The cdc25 protein contains an intrinsic phosphatase activity”, Dunphy, et al. ., Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125. Cell, 1991, 67(1):189–196.Google Scholar
“smart machhines at the DNA replication fork” ; B Stillman et al., Cell, 1994.Google Scholar
Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface” Stevens, MM, et al. ., Science, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adiabatic Pumping Mechanism for Ion Motive ATPases”; Dean Astumian, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 118102 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Microneedle biosensor: A method for direct label-free real time protein detection”; Esfandyarpour, Rahim, et al. ., Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical; Volume 177, Pages 848–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Electrical Detection of Protein Biomarkers Using Nanoneedle Biosensors”. Rahim Esfandyarpour et al., MRS Proceeding / Volume1414 / 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilchek, M.; Bayer, E.A. (Eds.), Meth. Enzymology, 184 (1990) 3–240.Google Scholar
Butler, J.E.; van Oss, C.J., van Regenmortel, M.H.V. (Eds.), Immunochemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York (1994), pp. 759–803 Google Scholar
Stott, D.I.; van Oss, C.J., van Regenmortel, M.H.V. (Eds.), Immunochemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York (1994), pp. 925–948 Google Scholar
Mazttila, A.T., Laitineu, O.H., Airenne, K.J., Kulik, T., Bayer, E.A., Wilchek, M., M.S. Kulomaa FEBS Lett., 467 (2000), p. 31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salama, A.D., Dougan, T., Levy, J.B., Cook, H.T., Morgan, S.H., Nandeer, S., Maidment, G., George, A.J.T., Evans, S., Lightstone, L., Pusey, C.D. Am.. J. Kidney Diseases, 39 (2002), p. 1162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dielectric Properties of Proteins from Simulation: The Effects of Solvent, Ligands, pH, and Temperature”; Pitera, Jed W. et al. ., Biophysical Journal, Volume 80, 2001, 2546 –2555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Electron tunneling through proteins”; Gray, Harry B. et al. ., Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 36, 3 (2003), pp. 341–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Electron transfer in proteins”; Larsson, Sven ; Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1365 (1998) 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar