Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:03:59.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Conductivity of Bentonite/Quartz High-Level Waste Package Backfill*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Marvin Moss
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
Martin A. Molecke
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
Get access

Abstract

A mixture of bentonite clay and quartz sand is being considered for use as a waste-package backfill, the material placed between a radioactive-waste canister and the repository host rock. Compacts of bentonite/quartz with weight-percent ratios of 100/0, 70/30, 50/50 and 30/70 were made at room temperature under a pressure of 100 MPa (15 ksi). Upon initial heating, the thermal conductivity of the 70/30 compact rose from 1.20 W/m·K at 298 K to 1.32 W/m·K at 373 K. After further heating to 473 K, it fell to 1.10 W/m·K, reflecting the loss of interlamellar water from the bentonite. The conductivity of the now-dehydrated compact was reproducible through several heating and cooling cycles, varying from 1.15 W/m·K at 573 K to 1.03 W/m·K at 298 K. The other mixtures were qualitatively similar to the 70/30: the 100/0, 50/50 and 30/70 dehydrated compacts displayed conductivities of 0.59, 1.06 and 0.83 W/m.K,respectively, at 298 K. Measured densities ranged from 1.98 to 2.12 g/cc. Combined geometric-mean and Maxwell models for thermal conduction in composite systems predict the measured results reasonably well. An analysis of the impact of backfills on high-level waste (HLW) package design indicates that no significant thermal penalty is imposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work performed at Sandia National Laboratories supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-76-DP00789.

References

REFERENCES

1. Moss, M., Koski, J. A. and Haseman, G. M., Measurement of Thermal Conductivity by the Comparative Method, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 82–0109 (March 1982).Google Scholar
2. Lappin, A. R., Thermal Conductivity of Silicic Tuffs: Predictive Formalism and Comparison with Preliminary Experimental Results, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 80–0769 (July 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Maxwell, J. C., A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1904) 3rd Edition, Vol. 1, p. 440.Google Scholar
4. Brailsford, A. D. and Major, K. G., Br. J. Appl. Phys. 15, 313 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Woodside, W. and Messmer, J. H., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1688 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McKenzie, D. R., McPhedran, R. C. and Derrick, G. H., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 362, 211 (1978).Google Scholar
7. Molecke, M. A., Sandia National Laboratories, to be published.Google Scholar
8. Molecke, M. A., Schaefer, D. W., Glass, R. S., and Ruppen, J. A., “Sandia HLW Canister/Overpack Studies Applicable for a Salt Repository,” in Advances in Science and Technology of the Management of High-Level Nuclear Waste, Hoffman, P., Editor (Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, 1982) Vol. I.Google Scholar
9. Slate, S. C., Ross, W. A., Partain, W. L., Reference Commercial High-Level Waste Glass and Canister Definition, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-3838 (September 1981).Google Scholar
10. Gartling, D. K., “Coyote” - A Finite Element Computer Program for Non-Linear Heating Conduction Problems, Sandia Laboratories Report SAND 77–1332 (June 1978).Google Scholar
11. Sweet, J. N. and McCreight, J. E., Thermal Properties Measurement on Rocksalt Samples from the Site of the Proposed Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 80–0709 (May 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Nowak, E. J., The Backfill Barrier as a Component in a Multiple Barrier Nuclear Waste Isolation System, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 79–1109 (May 1980).Google Scholar
13. Nowak, E. J., Backfill Barriers for Nuclear Waste Repositories in Salt, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 81–0377A (March 1981).Google Scholar
14. Clairborne, H. C., Rickertsen, L. D. and Graham, R. F., Expected Environments in High-Level Nuclear Waste and Spent Fuel Repositories in Salt, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-7201 (August 1980).Google Scholar