Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:05:39.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Theoretical Study of Structural Disorder and Photoluminescence Linewidth in InGaAs/GaAs Self Assembled Quantum Dots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Yih-Yin Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122
Hongtao Jiang
Affiliation:
Broadcom Corporation, Irvine, CA 92618
Jasprit Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122
Get access

Abstract

The past few years have seen considerable efforts in growth and device application of self-assembled quantum dots. However, the photoluminescence (PL) linewidth, which represents structural fluctuations in dot sizes, is still in the range of 30-50 meV. This large linewidth has deleterious effects on devices such as lasers based on self-assembled dots. In this paper we will examine the configuration-energy diagram of self-assembled dots. Our formalism is based on: (1) an atomistic Monte Carlo method which allows us to find the minimum energy configuration and strain tensors as well as intermediate configurations of dots; (2) an 8-band k p method to calculate the electronic spectra. We present results on the strain energy per unit cell for various distributions of InAs/GaAs quantum dots and relate them to published experimental results. In particular we examine uncovered InAs/GaAs dots and show that in the uncovered state a well-defined minimum exists in the configuration energy plot. The minimum corresponds to the size that agrees well with experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Marzin, J.-Y., Gérard, J.-M., Izraël, A., Barrier, D., and Bastard, G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 716 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Teichert, C., Lagally, M. G., Peticolas, L. J., Bean, J. C., and Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. B, 53, 16334 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Krishna, S., Quasaimeh, O., Bhattacharya, P., MaCann, P. J., and Namjou, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 3355 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Jiang, H. and Singh, J., Physica E, 2, 720 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Keating, P. N., Phys. Rev., 145, 637 (1966).Google Scholar
6. Martin, R. M., Phys. Rev. B, 1, 4005 (1969).Google Scholar
7. Grundmann, M., Ledentsov, N. N., Stier, O., Bimberg, D., Ustinov, V. M., Kop'ev, P. S., and Alferov, Zh. I., Appl. Phys. Lett., 68, 979 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Cusack, M. A., Briddon, P. R., and Jaros, M., Phys. Rev. B, 54, R2300 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Krishna, S., Sabarinathan, J., Bhattacharya, P., Lita, B., and Goldman, R. S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 18, 1502 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Bernard, J. and Zunger, A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 65, 165 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Glas, F., J. Appl. Phys., 66, 1667 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Weidmann, M. R. and Newman, K. E., Phys. Rev. B, 45, 2763 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Jiang, H. and Singh, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 71, 3239 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Alder, F., Geiger, M., Bauknecht, A., Scholz, F., Schweizer, H., Pikuhn, M. H., Ohnesorge, B., and Forchel, A., J. Appl. Phys., 80, 4019 (1996).Google Scholar