Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:40:32.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical Models of Cooperative Dynamics Near the Glass Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Josef Jäckle
Josef Jäckle*
Affiliation:
University of Konstanz, Fakultät für Physik D-7750 Konstanz, Germany
Get access

Abstract

It is shown that diffusion in the hard-square and hard-octahedron lattice gases at high particle concentration has cooperative properties resembling molecular relaxation in undercooled liquids near the glass transition. For these models a characteristic length of cooperativity is introduced by an underlying percolation problem, which determines whether permanently blocked particles exist in lattices of finite size. The percolation problem belongs to a general class of bootstrap percolation models. Salient Monte Carlo results for the concentration and size dependence of self diffusion in the hard-square lattice gas are presented. Similarities with the n-spin facilitated kinetic Ising models are also pointed out.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 215: Symposium R2 – Structure, Relaxation and Physical Aging of Glassy Polymers , 1990 , 151
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cohen, M.H., Turnbull, D., J. Chem. Pys. 31, 1164 (1959)Google Scholar
2. Glarum, S.H., J. Chem. Phys. 33, 639 (1960)Google Scholar
3. Bordewijk, K.P., Chem. Phys. Lett. 32,592 (1975)Google Scholar
4. Condat, C.A., Z. Phys. B 77, 313 (1989)Google Scholar
5. Jäckle, J., in Relaxation in Complex Systems and Related Topics, edited by Campbell, I.A. and Giovannella, C. (Plenum Press, New York, in the press)Google Scholar
6. Jäckle, J., Rep. Progr. Phys. 49, 171 (1986)Google Scholar
7. Palmer, R.G., Stein, D.L., Abrahams, E., Anderson, P.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 958 (1984)Google Scholar
8. Adam, G., Gibbs, J.H., J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139 (1965)Google Scholar
9. Murch, G.E., Phil. Mag. A 44, 699 (1981)Google Scholar
10. Ertel, W., Froböse, K., Jäckle, J., J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5027 (1988)Google Scholar
11. Froböse, K., J. Stat. Phys. 55, 1285 (1989)Google Scholar
12. Jäckle, J., Froböse, K., Knödler, D., J. Stat. Phys., in the pressGoogle Scholar
13. Pitis, R., Phys. Rev. B41, 7156 (1990)Google Scholar
14. Gaunt, D.S., Fisher, M.E., J. Chem. Phys. 43, 2840 (1965)Google Scholar
15. Faux, D.A., Ross, D.K., J. Less-Common Met. 129, 229 (1987)Google Scholar
16. Fredrickson, G.H., Andersen, H.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1244 (1984)Google Scholar
17. Fredrickson, G.H., Andersen, H.C., J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5822 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Fredrickson, G.H., Brawer, S.A., J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3351 (1986)Google Scholar
19. Fredrickson, G.H., Ann., N.Y. Acad. Sci. 484, 185 (1986)Google Scholar
20. Doolittle, A.K., J. Appl. Phys. 22, 1471 (1951)Google Scholar
21. Adler, J., Physica, A, in the pressGoogle Scholar
22. Adler, J., Stauffer, D., Aharony, A., J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, L297 (1989)Google Scholar
23. Froböse, K., Jäckle, J., J. Stat. Phys. 42, 551 (1986)Google Scholar
24. Kogut, P.M., Leath, P.L., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 14, 3187 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Nakanishi, H., Takano, H., Phys. Lett. A115, 117 (1986)Google Scholar
26. Gaunt, D.S., J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3237 (1967)Google Scholar
27. Murch, G.E., Phil. Mag. A41, 701 (1980)Google Scholar
28. Pitis, R., Phys. Rev. B, in the pressGoogle Scholar
29. van Enter, A.C.D., Adler, J., Duarte, J.A.M.S., J. Stat. Phys. 60, 323 (1990)Google Scholar
30. Schonmann, R.H., preprint “On the behaviour of some cellular automata related to bootstrap percolation; J. Stat. Phys. 58, 1239 (1990)Google Scholar
31. Aizenman, M., Lebowitz, J.L., J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21, 3801 (1988)Google Scholar
32. Läuger, P., Biophys. J. 53, 877 (1988)Google Scholar
33. Condat, C.A., Jäckle, J., Biophys. J. 55, 915 (1989)Google Scholar
34. Condat, C.A., Phys. Rev. A39, 2112 (1989)Google Scholar