Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:24:26.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical Analysis of the CO Oxidation Process on Neutral and Single Ionized Au18 Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jorge Castro ,
Jorge Soto ,
Bertha Molina  and
Alipio Calles
Jorge Castro
Affiliation:
[email protected], CINVESTAV, Physics Department, Mexico D. F., Mexico
Jorge Soto
Affiliation:
[email protected], UNAM, Physics Department, Mexico D. F., Mexico
Bertha Molina
Affiliation:
[email protected], UNAM, Physics Department, Mexico D. F., Mexico
Alipio Calles
Affiliation:
[email protected], UNAM, Physics Department, Mexico D. F., Mexico
Get access

Abstract

Experiments on the reactivity of CO for Au nanoclusters have shown a local maximum in the adsorption of the first molecule for Au18 and its cation, whereas O2 adsorption has been observed in Au18-1. In this work we present a theoretical analysis of the preferential sites for the adsorption of the CO and O2 molecules on neutral and single ionized Au18 clusters with C2v symmetry, which has been shown both theoretical and experimentally, to be the most stable isomer of the Au18 cluster. We report the results of the calculation for the binding energies of CO and O2 for non-equivalent sites and compare with the available experimental values. The oxidation mechanism is studied in first instance by the subsequent adsorption of the CO on the O2 molecule, which was previously adsorbed on the respective gold cluster. The study is based on a DFT-GGA calculation with the PW91 functional.

Keywords

simulationoxidationnanostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1217: Symposium Y – Catalytic Materials for Energy, Green Processes and Nanotechnology , 2009 , 1217-Y03-18
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yuan, D. W. and Zeng, Z., J. Chem. Phys. 120, 6574 (2004).Google Scholar
2 Salisbury, B. E., Wallace, W. T. and Whetten, R. L., Chem. Phys. 262, 131 (2000).Google Scholar
3 Neumaier, M., Weigend, F., Hampe, O. and Kappes, M. M., J. Chem. Phys. 122, 104702 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Nygren, M. A., Siegbahn, P. E. M., Jin, C.-M., Guo, T. and Smalley, R. E., J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6181 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Wallace, W. T., Whetten, R. L., J. Phys. Chem. B104, 10964 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Veldeman, N., Lievens, P. and Anderson, M., J. Phys. Chem. A109, 11793 (2005).Google Scholar
7 Kim, Y. D., Fischer, M. and Ganteför, G., Chem. Phy. Lett. 377, 170 (2003).Google Scholar
8 Bulusu, S., Li, X., Wang, L.-S., and Zeng, X. C., PNAS 103, 8326 (2006).Google Scholar
9 Frisch, M. J. et al., Gaussian03, Gaussian Inc. Wallinford, CT. 2004.Google Scholar
10 Okumura, M., Kitagawa, G., Haruta, M., Yamaguchi, K., Appl. Catal. A: General 291, 37 (2005).Google Scholar
11 Häkkinen, H. and Landman, U., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 9704 (2001).Google Scholar
12 Prestianni, A., Martorana, A., Labat, F., Ciofini, I. and Adamo, C., J. Mol. Struct.-TheoChem 903, 34 (2009).Google Scholar