Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:58:05.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Variation in Energy Absorption System Functionalized by Nanomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yu Qiao
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California-San Diego, Structural Engineering, La Jolla, California, United States
Zhongyuan Sun
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Texas-Pan American, Chemistry, Edinburg, Texas, United States
Weiyi Lu
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California-San Diego, Structural Engineering, La Jolla, California, United States
Aijie Han
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Texas-Pan American, Chemistry, Edinburg, Texas, United States
Get access

Abstract

The thermal effect on the nanofluidic behaviors in a nanoporous silica gel is investigated experimentally. When a nanoporous silica gel is modified by silyl groups, its surface becomes hydrophobic. A sufficiently high external pressure must be applied to overcome the capillary effect; otherwise liquid infiltration could not occur. The formation and the disappearance of a solid–liquid interface are employed for energy storage or dissipation. When the hydrophobic surface of nanoporous silica gel is decomposed at various temperatures, the organic surface layers can be deactivated. As a result, the degree of hydrophobicity, which can be measured by the liquid infiltration pressure, is lowered. The infiltration and defiltration behaviors of liquid are dependent on the controlled by the decomposition-treatment temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Polarz, S. and Smarsly, B.: Nanoporous Materials. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2, 581 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Martin, T., Lefevre, B., Brunel, D., et al., Dissipative water intrusion in hydrophobic MCM-41 type materials. Chem. Commun., 24 (2002).Google Scholar
[3] Han, A., Punyamurtula, V.K. and Qiao, Y. Effects of cation size on infiltration and defiltration pressures of a MCM-41. Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, 153117, 1 (2008).Google Scholar
[4] Riviere, J. C. and Myhra, S.: Handbook of Surface and Interface Analysis. CRC Press (1998).Google Scholar
[5] Lu, G. and Yu, T.: Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials. CRC Press (2003).Google Scholar
[6] , Karami and Rohani, S.: Progressive strategies for nanozeolite Y synthesis: A review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 23, 1 (2007).Google Scholar
[7] Zukal, : Recent trends in the synthesis of nanoporous materials. Chem. Listy 101, 208 (2007).Google Scholar
[8] Yang, M. and Chao, K. J.: Functionalization of molecularly templated mesoporous silica. J. Chinese Chem. Soc. 49, 883 (2002).Google Scholar
[9] , Han and Qiao, Y.: Controlling infiltration pressure of a nanoporous silica gel via surface treatment. Chem. Lett. 36, 882 (2007).Google Scholar
[10] , Han and Qiao, Y.: Effects of surface treatment of a MCM-41 on motions of confined liquids. J. Phys. D - Appl. Phys. 40, 5743 (2007).Google Scholar
[11] Lim, M. H. and Stein, A.: Comparative studies of grafting and direct syntheses of inorganicorganic hybrid mesoporous materials. Chem. Mater. 11, 3285 (1999).Google Scholar
[12] Fay, J. A.: Fluid Mechanics. MIT Press (1994).Google Scholar