Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:03:53.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature Dependence of Fracture Toughness of the Cubic (L12) Titanium Trialuminides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. A. Varin  and
L. Zbroniec
R. A. Varin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
L. Zbroniec
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
Get access

Abstract

Fracture toughness vs. temperature of the cubic (L12), Mn- modified titanium trialuminide (based on Al3Ti) was investigated in air at the temperature range up to 1000°C. Toughness calculated from the maximum load exhibits a broad peak (KQ≈7–10 MPara0,5) at the 200- 500°C temperature range and then decreases with increasing temperature, reaching a room temperature value of ∼4.5 MPam0.5 at 1000°C. However, the work of fracture (γWOF, J/m2) and the stress intensity factor calculated from it (KIWOF) increases continuously with increasing temperature. Fracture modes exhibit a gradual transition from transgranular cleavage at room temperature to predominantly intergranular failure at the 800- 1000°C range.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 460: Symposium Z – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys VII , 1996 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kumar, K.S. in Structural Intermetallics, edited by Darolia, R., Lewandowski, J.J., Liu, C.T., Martin, P.L., Miracle, D.B. and Nathal, M.V. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1993), p. 87–96.Google Scholar
2. Brown, S.A. and Kumar, , J. Mater. Res. 8, 1763–66 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Nose, T. and Fuji, T., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 71, 328–33 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Bluhm, J.L., Eng. Fracture Mech. 7, 593–604 (1975).Google Scholar
5. Munz, D., Bubsey, R.T., and Srawley, J.E., Int. J. of Fracture, 16, 359–374 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Whithey, P.A. and Bowen, P., Int. J. of Fracture, 46, R55-R59 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Zhang, S. and Mikkola, D.E., Scripta Metall. Mater. 26, 1315–20 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Kumar, K.S. and Brown, S.A., Acta Metall. Mater. 26, 1923–32 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Wu, Z.L. and Pope, D.P., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 519–26 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Winnicka, M.B. and Varin, R.A., Metall. Trans. A, 24A, 935–46 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Sakai, M. and Ichikawa, H., Int. J. of Fracture, 55, 65–79 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Smith, J.A., Limthongkul, P. and Sass, S.L. in Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials IV, edited by Srivatsan, T.S. and Moore, J.J. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1996).Google Scholar
13. Rodeghiero, E.D., Tse, O.K., Wolkenberg, B.S., and Gianuelis, E.P. in Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials IV, edited by Srivatsan, T.S. and Moore, J.J. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1996)pp. 775–88.Google Scholar
14. Jenkins, M.G., Ferber, M.K., Ghosh, A., Peussa, J.T., and Salem, J.A. in Chevron- Notch Fracture Test Experience: Metals and Non- Metals ASTM STP1172. edited by Brown, K.R. and Baratta, F.I. (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1992) pp. 159–77.Google Scholar
15. Mikkola, D.E., Nic, J.P., Zhang, S., and Milligan, W.W., ISIJ International, 31, 1076–79 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Nakamura, M. in Intermetallic Compounds Vol. 1 Principles, edited by Westbrook, J.H. and Fleischer, R.L. (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1995) pp. 873–93.Google Scholar
17. Kumar, K.S. and Brown, S.A., Phil. Mag. A, 65, 91–109 (1992).Google Scholar