Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T09:58:10.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature Dependence of Copper (II) Catalyzed Oxidation of Propylene on X Zeolite: Relation To Copper (II) Migration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Jong-Sung Yu  and
Larry Kevan
Jong-Sung Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004
Larry Kevan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004
Get access

Abstract

The copper(II) catalyzed oxidation of propylene on CuK-X zeolite was studied over the temperature range of 150 to 400°C in a flow system. Arrhenius activation energies could be obtained at less than 30%conversion from 160 to 210°C and were found to decrease with increasing copper(II) content. These results are correlated with electron spin resonance studies of the migration of copper(II) within the zeolite lattice at the reaction temperature. The change in activation energy with copper(II) content shows that a substantial part of the total activation energy is due to copper(II) migration.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 111: Symposium O – Microstructure and Properties of Catalysts , 1987 , 425
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Maxwell, I. E., Advances in Catalysis, Vol.31. (Academic Press, New York, 1982), p. 1.Google Scholar
2. Lunsford, J. H., Catal. Rev. 12, 137 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Lee, H. and Kevan, L., J. Phys. Chem. 90, 5781 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Yu, J. S., Lee, H. and Kevan, L., Proc. 10th North Amer. Catal. Soc. Meeting, (1987), in press.Google Scholar
5. Kevan, L., Acct. Chem. Research 20, 1 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Gentry, S. J., Rudham, R. and Sanders, M.K., J. Catal. 35, 376 (1974).Google Scholar
7. Mochida, I., Hayata, S., Kato, A. and Seiyama, T., J. Catal. 15, 314 (1969).Google Scholar