Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:40:39.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tem Analysis of Interfacial Reactions Between TiWn, Wn Gate Metallizations and GaAs in Mesfet Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

K.S. Jones ,
H.G. Robinson ,
C. Jasper ,
W. Cronin  and
M. Durlam
K.S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
H.G. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
C. Jasper
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Tempe, AZ
W. Cronin
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Tempe, AZ
M. Durlam
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Tempe, AZ
Get access

Abstract

In an effort to improve the uniformity of the threshold voltage, the Schottky barrier height, and the ideality factor, Ti0.29W0.52N0.19 and W0.81N0.19 gate metal depositions have been investigated as a function of annealing conditions for GaAs based MESFET devices. Crosssectional TEM samples were made of each device. The results of these studies indicate there is a systematic and significant reaction occurring between the gate metal and the GaAs upon 850°C and 900°C rapid thermal annealing. These reactions take different forms depending on whether Ti is present or not. If Ti is absent (i.e. WN gates) then the interfacial roughness between the gate and the GaAs is less than 30Å indicating the metallization is very unreactive. The WN contacts for some gates show void formation indicative of GaAs decomposition also for some devices an amorphous layer is observed at the interface. Selected area diffraction patterns indicate only the alpha-W and beta-W2N phases are present. For the TiWN gates the interface roughness is as large as 200Å upon 900°C 10 second RTA. However no voids or interfacial amorphous layers were observed. Again only alpha-W and beta-W2N were observed in the bulk of the gates. For both systems, beta-W2N appears to form at the interface however the morphology of the beta-W2N grains are much larger for the TiWN gates. Electrical results indicate the TiWN gates have a lower ideality factor (near 1.1) and greater uniformity across the wafer compared to the WN gates. It is proposed that the presence of Ti in the gate metal aids in reducing any surface oxides thus improving the ideality and uniformity of the gate metal/GaAs contact.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 319: Symposia CB – Defect-Interface Interactions , 1993 , 81
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morgan, D. V. and Wood, J., Appl. Surf. Sci. 38, 517 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Potter, M. de, Raedt, W. De, Hove, M. Van, Zou, G., Bender, H. and Meuris, M., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 4775 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Hove, M. Van, Potter, M. de, Raedt, W. De, Zou, G. and Rossum, M. Van, J. de Physique C 4, 445 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Zhang, L. C., Liang, C. L., Cheung, S. K. and Cheung, N. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 1716 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Zhang, L. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 445 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chen, H., Sadwick, L. P., Sokolich, M., Wang, K. L., Larson, R. D. and Chi, T. Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 1096 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Geissberger, A. E., Sadler, R. A., Balzan, M. L. and Crites, J. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 1701 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Uchitomi, N., Nagaoka, M., Shimada, K., Mizoguchi, T. and Toyoda, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 1392 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Yamagishi, H. and Yamamoto, Y., J. Journal of Appl. Phys. 26, 122 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ding, J., Lee, B., Yu, K. M., Gronsky, R. and Washburn, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh 1989) 41.Google Scholar
11. Cheung, S. K., Kwok, S. P., Kaleta, A., Yu, K. M., Jaklevic, J. M., Liang, C. L., Cheung, N. W. and Haller, E. E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 6, 1779 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Geissberger, A. E., Sadler, R. A., Leyenaar, F. A. and Balzan, M. L., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 4, 3091 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Steiner, K., N. Uchitomi and Toyoda, N., Jap. J. Appl. Phy. 29, 489 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Yamagishi, H., J. Journal of Applied Physics 23, L895 (1984).Google Scholar
15. Nowicki, R., Harris, J., Nicolet, M. and Mitchell, I., Thin Solid Films 5f3, 195 (1978).Google Scholar
16. Jones, K. S., Prussin, S. and Weber, E. R., Appl. Phys. A 45, 1 (1988).Google Scholar