Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:32:07.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Technical Note on the Determination of Free Lime (CaO) in Fly Ash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Scott Schlorholtz
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Department of Civil Engineering, Ames, IA 50011
Turgut Demirel
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, Department of Civil Engineering, Ames, IA 50011
Get access

Abstract

Many fly ashes contain free lime (CaO) and periclase (MgO) [1,2]. These two compounds, when present in excessive amounts, are known to cause soundness problems in portland cement [3,4]. Recent work [5] has indicated that the autoclave expansion of portland cement-fly ash pastes is related to the concentration of CaO and MgO in a given paste, free lime typically being more detrimental than periclase. The purpose of this technical note is to briefly discuss two methods that are currently available for determining the free lime content of fly ash, and to suggest a supplement to the autoclave test (described in ASTM C 151). The major drawback of the autoclave test is that it requires approximately two days to complete and therefore it would be helpful to have a quick chemical test that could be used to indicate the soundness properties of a given fly ash.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mings, M. L., Schlorholtz, S., Pitt, J. M., and Demirel, T., Transportation Research Record 941, 511 (1983).Google Scholar
2. McCarthy, G. J., Swanson, K. D., Keller, L. P., and Butler, W. C., Cement and Concrete Research, 14, 471478 (1984).10.1016/0008-8846(84)90121-2Google Scholar
3. Gonnerman, H. F., Lerch, W., and Whiteside, T. M., PCA Research Laboratory Bulletin 45 (June 1953).Google Scholar
4. Lea, F. M., The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 366–367 (1971).Google Scholar
5. Schlorholtz, S. and Demirel, T., this symposium.Google Scholar
6. ASTM, 1981 Annual Book of Standards, Part 13 (1981).10.1016/0010-4485(81)90176-7Google Scholar
7. Javellana, M. P. and Jawed, I., Cement and Concrete Research, 12, 399403 (1982).10.1016/0008-8846(82)90088-6Google Scholar