Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:25:47.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technetium-99 Chemistry in Reducing Groundwaters: Implications for the Performance of a Proposed High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Roberto T. Pabalan ,
David R. Turner  and
Michael P. Miklas Jr
Roberto T. Pabalan
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX [email protected]
David R. Turner
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX [email protected]
Michael P. Miklas Jr
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166
Get access

Abstract

Performance assessment calculations by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission indicate that Tc-99 is a major contributor to dose to a hypothetical receptor group 20 km downgradient of a proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, within the first 10,000 yr after permanent closure. This result is due in large part to the high solubility and low retardation of Tc under oxidizing conditions in the Yucca Mountain environment. Recent site characterization data on the chemistry of saturated zone groundwater at Yucca Mountain and vicinity indicate the presence of locally reducing geochemical conditions, which could decrease the solubility and enhance the sorption and retardation of Tc-99. In this study, a preliminary assessment of the potential effects of reducing conditions on the transport and release of Tc-99 was conducted. Sensitivity analyses using the NRC/CNWRA Total-system Performance Assessment code (TPA Version 3.2) indicate that decreased Tc solubility and increased Tc sorption due to reduction of Tc(7+) to Tc(4+) can significantly delay the arrival of Tc-99 at the receptor group location. Decreased Tc solubility can decrease the Tc-99 dose by three orders of magnitude relative to the TPA 3.2 base case. Enhanced Tc retardation in the tuff aquifer only does not greatly decrease the calculated Tc-99 peak dose, whereas increased Tc retardation in the alluvial aquifer alone prevents Tc-99 from reaching the receptor group in 50,000 yr. The release and transport of other redox-sensitive radioelements could be affected in a manner similar to Tc. Thus, reduced groundwater conditions could significantly enhance the performance of the geologic barrier system and reduce the dose to the receptor group.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 608: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII , 1999 , 231
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Lieser, K.H. and Bauscher, C. H., Radiochimica Acta 42, 205 (1987); 44/45, 125 (1988).Google Scholar
2 U.S. Department of Energy, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain, DOE/RW-0508 (Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Las Vegas NV, 1998).Google Scholar
3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for a Proposed HLW Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Using TPA 3.1. Results and Conclusions, NUREG-1668, Vol. 2 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 1999).Google Scholar
4 Mohanty, S., Codell, R., Rice, R.W. et al. , System-Level Repository Sensitivity Analyses Using TPA Version 3.2 Code, CNWRA 99-002 (Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX, 1999).Google Scholar
5 U.S. Department of Energy, Downhole Eh and pH Measurements for UE-25 WT#17, Available at http://m-oext.ymp.gov/html/prod/db_tdp/atdt/internet/TDIF307214.html (1999).Google Scholar
6 Ogard, A.E. and Kerrisk, J.F., Groundwater Chemistry Along Flow Paths Between a Proposed Repository Site and the Accessible Environment, LA-10188-MS (Los Alamos Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1984).Google Scholar
7 Nye County. Nye County Nuclear Waste Repository Project Office: Early Warning Drilling Program. Available at http://www.nyecounty.com/ewdpmain.htm (1999).Google Scholar
8 Mohanty, S. and McCartin, T., Total-system Performance Assessment (TPA) Version 3.2 Code: Module Descriptions and User's Guide (Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX (1998).Google Scholar
9 Sandino, M. and Osthols, E. (editors), Chemical Thermodynamics of Technetium (North-Holland, Amsterdam, in press).Google Scholar
10 U.S. Department of Energy, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project Technical Data Management Site and Engineering Properties, Available at http://m-oext.ymp.gov/html/prod/db_tdp/sep/internet/ default.htm (1999).Google Scholar
11 Meyer, R.E., Arnold, W.D., Case, F.I., and OKelley, G.D., Radiochimica Acta 55, 11 (1991).Google Scholar
12 Dunn, D.S., Pan, Y.-M., and Gragnolino, G.A., Effects of Environmental Factors on the Aqueous Corrosion of High-Level Radioactive Waste Containers—Experimental Results and Models, CNWRA 99-004 (Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX, 1999).Google Scholar
13 Langmuir, D., Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997).Google Scholar