Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:28:29.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching & Learning in Nanoscale Science & Engineering: A Focus on Social & Ethical Issues and K-16 Science Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Aldrin E. Sweeney
Aldrin E. Sweeney*
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Central Florida, Science Education, College of Education, 123L, Orlando, FL, 32816-1250, United States, 407-823-2561, 407-823-2815
Get access

Abstract

Continuing advances in human ability to manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular levels (i.e. nanoscale science and technology) offer a range of previously unimagined possibilities for scientific discovery and technological application. Paralleling these scientific advances is the increasing realization that a number of associated ethical, environmental, economic, legal and social implications also need to be explored [1]. Additionally, prominent commentators such as Mihail Roco [2] of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative (www.nano.gov) have argued that “education and training [in scientific concepts at the nanoscale] must be introduced at all levels, from kindergarten to continuing education, from scientists to non-technical audiences that may decide the use of technology and its funding” (p. 1248).

The paper below is structured in three inter-related sections. The first section provides a brief report on science education research conducted in the third year of an initial 3-year National Science Foundation funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates program in nanoscience and nanotechnology at the University of Central Florida. Participating undergraduate students and research faculty were asked to respond to a survey -adapted from Bainbridge [3]- that attempted to measure their attitudes to a variety of social and ethical issues currently associated with nanoscale science and engineering research. Selected findings are presented, and implications for the future of K-16 science education, undergraduate engineering education and Science-Technology-Society (STS) studies also are briefly discussed.

Consideration of social and ethical issues associated with nanotechnology research will generate several implications for general scientific literacy and public science education policy. Some of these implications are addressed in the second section. Given the extent to which these new technologies are expected to impact all aspects of human experience, public scientific literacy regarding nanotechnology becomes an issue of considerable importance. Here, the onus falls on science educators at the K-12 and university levels to become knowledgeable about nanoscale science and engineering research, and to share their pedagogical expertise with nanotechnology researchers. This section of the presentation will focus on the “social and ethical issues in science” K-12 standards already present in national documents such as the U.S. National Science Education Standards, the American Association for the Advancement of Science's Project 2061 Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy, and the British National Curriculum. Specific examples from current research in nanoscale science and engineering are used to demonstrate how various nanoscale science/engineering concepts may usefully be incorporated into the K-12 science curriculum.

The third section of the paper provides an overview of selected international efforts in K-16 nanoscale science and engineering education, and briefly discusses various instructional approaches and techniques that are likely to be useful for other science and engineering educators. Examples are used from a forthcoming book on nanoscale science and engineering education for which the author is a co-editor.

Keywords

nanoscalebiomedicalnanostructure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 931: Symposium KK – Education in Nanoscience and Engineering , 2006 , 0931-KK03-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Roco, M. C. and Bainbridge, W. S. (eds.), Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2001).Google Scholar
2. Roco, M. C., Nature Biotech. 21, 1247–1249 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Bainbridge, W. S., J. Nanoparticle Res. 4, 561–570 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Kelsall, R. W., Hamley, I. W. and Geoghegan, M. (eds), Nanoscale Science and Technology (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 2005).Google Scholar
5. Cahn, R. W., Nature Materials, 1, 3–4 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Service, R. F., Science, 310, 1132–1134 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Colvin, V. L., Nature Biotech. 21, 1166–1170 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Hoet, P. H. M., Nemmar, A. and Nemery, B., Nature Biotech. 22, 19 (2004)Google Scholar
9. Roco, M. C. and Bainbridge, W. S. (eds), Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (National Science Foundation/U.S. Department of Commerce, Arlington, VA, 2002). Available online: http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/.Google Scholar
10. Mulhall, D., Our Molecular Future: How Nanotechnology, Robotics, Genetics and Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Our World (Prometheus Books, New York, 2002).Google Scholar
11. Roco, M. C. and Montemagno, C. D. (eds), The Coevolution of Human Potential and Converging Technologies (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013, New York, 2004).Google Scholar
12. Montemagno, C. D. in The Coevolution of Human Potential and Converging Technologies, edited by Roco, M. C. and Montemagno, C. D. (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013, New York, 2004) pp. 38–49.Google Scholar
13. The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering, London, UK, 2004). Available online: http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htmGoogle Scholar
14. Sweeney, A. E., Seal, S. and Vaidyanathan, P., Bulletin Sci. Tech. & Society, 23, 236–245 (2003).Google Scholar
15. Sweeney, A. E., Vaidyanathan, P. and Seal, S., Int. J. Engng. Ed., 22, 157–170 (2006).Google Scholar
16. Sweeney, A. E., Sci. and Engng. Ethics, 12, (2006) (in press).Google Scholar
17. Mnyusiwalla, A., Daar, A. S. and Singer, P. A., Nanotechnology, 14, R9–R13 (2003)Google Scholar
18. Editorial, Nature Materials, 4, 105 (2005)Google Scholar
19. Sayes, C. M., Fortner, J. D., Guo, W., Lyon, D., Boyd, A. M., Ausman, K. D., Tao, Y. J., Sitharaman, B., Wilson, L. J., Hughes, J. B., West, J. L. and Colvin, V. L., Nano Letters, 4, 1881–1887 (2004).Google Scholar
20. Savage, N. and Diallou, M. S., J. Nanoparticle Res. 7, 331–342 (2005).Google Scholar
21. Jones, M. G., Superfine, R. and Taylor, R., The Science Teacher, 66, 48–50 (1999).Google Scholar
22. Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Superfine, R. and Taylor, R., J. Res. Sci. Tchng, 40, 303–322 (2003).Google Scholar
23. Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Kubasko, D., Bokinsky, A., Tretter, T., Negishi, A., Taylor, R. and Superfine, R., Sci. Ed. 88, 55–71 (2004).Google Scholar
24. Sweeney, A. E. and Seal, S. (eds), Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education: Issues, Trends and Future Directions (American Scientific Publishers, Stevenson Ranch, CA, forthcoming).Google Scholar