Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:30:54.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis, Structural and Optical Characterization of Zinc Chalcogentdes in Novel Solid State Hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Kelly L. Moran
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Andrew W. Ott
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Thurman E. Gier
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
William T. A. Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Hellmut Eckert
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Galen D. Stucky
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access

Abstract

Several series of sodali te analogues of unit cell composition M8X2(TO2)12, where M is Zn or Cd, X is a chalcogen, and T is a tetrahedral cation B, or Be in combination with Si or Ge, have been prepared. An M4X tetrahedron, which is the first coordination sphere of the bulk semiconductor MX, sits at the center of each sodalite cage. These materials have been structurally characterized by solid state 77Se and 125STe MAS NMR and by powder X-ray diffraction. Diffuse reflectance optical absorption spectra are reported for each series. The borates have optical properties similar to the bulk MX whereas the beryllosilicates and germanates exhibit large blue shifts in the absorption spectra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Henglein, A., Top. Curr. Chem. 143, 113 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Alivisatos, A. P., Harris, A. L., Levinos, N. J., Steigerwald, M. L., Brus, L. E., J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4001 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Stucky, G. D. and MacDougall, J. E., Science, 247, 669 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Wang, Y., Herron, N., Mahler, W., Suna, A., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 4, 808 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Moran, K. L., Harrison, W. T. A., Gier, T. E., MacDougall, J. E., Stucky, G. D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 164, 123 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Gier, T. E., Harrison, W. T. A., Stucky, G. D., Angew. Chem, 103, 1191 (1991).Google Scholar
7. From a private communication with Thomas E. Mallouk. The sodalite material is washed for 12 to 24 hours in an aqueous Br2 solution which has been adjusted to a pH of 6 with bleach. This solution effectively dissolves bulk II-VI compounds.Google Scholar