Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:25:57.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Synchrotron Radiation Study of Nonlinear Diffusion in Cu-Au

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

E. S. K. Menon
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, Department of Materials and Mineral Engineering, Berkeley, CA 94720
P. Huang
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, Department of Materials and Mineral Engineering, Berkeley, CA 94720
M. Kraitchman
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, Department of Materials and Mineral Engineering, Berkeley, CA 94720
J. J. Hoyt
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Pullman, WA 99164
P. Chow
Affiliation:
University of Houston, Department of Physics, Houston, TX 77204
D. De Fontaine
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, Department of Materials and Mineral Engineering, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

Alternate layers of pure copper and gold were vapor deposited on a sodium chloride substrate, the average concentration of the films being Cu-16at% Au and the layering periodicity (modulation wavelength) being 3.31 nm. The composition modulation gives rise to satellite diffraction peaks around the (200) Bragg reflections. Synchrotron radiation at SSRL was able to detect up to third order satellite intensity the evolution of which was measured as a function of annealing time at 515 K. Although the first order satellite intensity decayed as expected exponentially with time, intensities of both second and third order satellites decreased very rapidly at first, then increased before decaying exponentially. These results are in conformity with theoretical models of satellite evolution during annealing in a onedimensional modulated system governed by a nonlinear diffusion equation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cahn, J. W., Acta Metall., vol. 9, p. 795, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Cook, H. E., Fontaine, D. de, and Hilliard, J. E., Acta Metall., vol. 17, p. 765, 1969.Google Scholar
3. Cook, H. E. and Hilliard, J. E., J. of Appl. Phys., vol. 40, p. 2191, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Paulson, W. M. and Hilliard, J.E., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 48, p. 2117, 1977.Google Scholar
5. Henein, G. E. and Hilliard, J. E., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 55, p. 2895, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Fontaine, D. de, Ph. D Thesis, Northwestern University, 1967.Google Scholar
7. Tsakalakos, T., Ph. D thesis, Northwestern University, 1977.Google Scholar
8. Greer, A. L., in Modulated structure materials, ed. Tsakalakos, T., p. 491, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands, 1984.Google Scholar
9. Fleming, R. M., McWhan, D. B., Goussard, A. C., Wiegmann, W., and Logan, R.A., J. Appl. Phys., vol. 51, p. 357, 1980.Google Scholar
10. Greer, A. L. and Spaepen, F., in Synthetic Modulated Structures, p. 419, Academic press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
11. Flevaris, N. K., Baral, D., Hilliard, J. E., and Ketterson, I. B., Appl. Phys. Lete., vol. 38, p. 992, 1981.Google Scholar
12. Okamoto, H., Chakrabarti, D. J., Laughlin, D. E., and Massalski, T. B., BAPD, vol. 8, p. 454, 1987.Google Scholar
13. Guinier, A., X-ray diffraction in crystals, imperfect crystals and amorphous bodies, Freeman, San Francisco, 1963.Google Scholar
14. Cahn, J. W., Acta Metall., vol. 10, p. 179, 1962.Google Scholar
15. Huntington, H. B., Solid State Physics, vol. 7, p. 274, 1958.Google Scholar
16. Butrymowicz, D. B., Manning, J. R., and Read, M. E., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, vol. 3, p. 527, 1974.Google Scholar