Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:59:01.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Susceptibility of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and S. epidermidis to Different Bismuth Compounds.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2012

Alejandro L. Vega-Jiménez
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Odontología, Circuito exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México D. F. México.
Edgardo Berea-Montes
Affiliation:
FarmaQuimia S.A de C.V., Andre Marie Ampere No. 11, Parque Industrial Cuamatla P.O. BOX 193, Cuautitlán Izcalli, 54730 México. Estado de México, México.
Argelia Almaguer-Flores
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Odontología, Circuito exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 México D. F. México.
Get access

Abstract

Bismuth has been used as an antimicrobial agent for treating gastrointestinal disorders, and has been used in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of the present study was to analyze the antimicrobial activity of different Bi compounds against opportunistic pathogens. Ten bismuth compounds were tested with three different concentrations (60, 30 and 10%), against pure cultures of the following bacterial strains: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The results show that Bismuth subsalicylate, Bismuth trioxide and Bismuth subgallate had a good antibacterial activity however, Bismuth subsalicylate was the most effective in the inhibition of the four bacterial strains tested. In this study we confirm the antibacterial properties of Bi-based compounds for other bacteria than H. pylori.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kirk, R.E. and Othmer, D.F.. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 4rd Ed. 1994. New York, NY: Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Delgadillo, M.. Zerovalent bismuth nanoparticles inhibit Streptococcus mutans growth and formation of biofilm. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012:7 21092113.Google ScholarPubMed
Figueroa-Quintanilla, D.. A controlled trial of bismuth subsalicylate in infants with acute watery diarrheal disease. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328(23):16531658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bierer, D.W.. Bismuth subsalicylate: history, chemistry, and safety. Rev. Infect. 1990. Dis. 12(Suppl. 1):S3–S8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, B.J.. GI drug column. The use of bismuth in gastroenterology. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1991.86:1625.Google Scholar
Veldhuyzen van Zanten, S.J.O and Sherman, P. M.. Helicobacter pylori infection as a cause of gastritis, duodenal ulcer, gastric cancer and nonnuclear dyspepsia: a systematic overview. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1994.150:177185.Google Scholar
DuPont, H.L. and Ericsson, C.D.. 1990. Use of bismuth subsalicylate for the prevention of travelers’ diarrhea. Rev. Infect. Dis. 12(Suppl. 1):S64–S67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, C.A.M. and Gearty, J.C.. Campylobacter pyloridis and associated gastritis: investigator blind, placebo-controlled trial of bismuth subsalicylate and eryth-romycin ethylsuccinate. Br Med J 1986;293:645–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanza, F.L. and Skoglund, M.L.. The effect of bismuth subsalicylate on the histologic gastritis seen with Campylobacter pylori, a placebo-controlled, ran-domized study. Am J Gastroenterology 1989;9:1060–4Google Scholar
Mora, L.T.A.. Hemostasia con bismuto. Revista ADM. 2003;(3):9094 Google Scholar
Manhart, M.D.. In vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Bismuth Subsalicylate and Other Bismuth Salts. Reviews of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 12: (Supp.1).1990) pp. S11S15 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittes, U. and Keppler, B. K.. Overview on bismuth (III) and bismuth (V) complexes with activity against Helicobacter pylori. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997.163:345364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar