Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:05:24.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Layer Effects on Waste Glass Corrosion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Xiangdong Feng
Xiangdong Feng*
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Chemical Technology Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439-4837.
Get access

Abstract

Water contact subjects waste glass to chemical attack that results in the formation of surface alteration layers. Two principal hypotheses have been advanced concerning the effect of surface alteration layers on continued glass corrosion: (1) they act as a mass transport barrier and (2) they influence the chemical affinity of the glass reaction. In general, transport barrier effects have been found to be less important than affinity effects in the corrosion of most high-level nuclear waste glasses. However, they can be important under some circumstances, for example, in a very alkaline solution, in leachants containing Mg ions, or under conditions where the matrix dissolution rate is very low. The latter suggests that physical barrier effect may affect the long-term glass dissolution rate. Surface layers influence glass reaction affinity through the effects of the altered glass and secondary phases on the solution chemistry. The reaction affinity may be controlled by various precipitates and crystalline phases, amorphous silica phases, gel layer, or all the components of the glass. The surface alteration layers influence radionuclide release mainly through colloid formation, crystalline phase incorporation, and gel layer retention. This paper reviews current understanding and uncertainties.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 333: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII , 1993 , 55
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 McVay, G. L. and Pederson, L. R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2, 323–330 (1980).Google Scholar
2 Clark, D. E. and L Hench, L., Nucl. Chem. Waste Mgmt. 2, 93–101 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 L Hench, L. and Clark, D. E., Surface Properties and Performance Prediction of Alternative Waste Forms, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-3472(1986).Google Scholar
4 White, W. B., Adv. Ceram. 20, 431–442 (1986).Google Scholar
5 Adams, P. B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 125, 115–127 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Doremus, R.H., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 125, 177–188 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Lutze, W., “Silicate Glasses,” Chapter 1, in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future. Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C., eds., North-Holland, New York, pp. 1–159 (1988).Google Scholar
8 Bates, J. K., L Ebert, W., Mazer, J. J., Bradley, J. P., Bradley, C. R., and Dietz, N. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 77–87 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 L Bourcier, W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 3–18 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Jantzen, C. M., “Thermodynamic Approach to Glass Corrosion,” in Corrosion of Glass. Ceramics and Superconductors. Principles. Testing. Characterization and Applications. Clark, D. E. and Zoitos, B. K., eds., Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, pp. 153–215 (1992).Google Scholar
11 Grambow, B., “Geochemical Approach to Glass Dissolution,” ibid., pp. 124–152 (1992).Google Scholar
12 Vemaz, E. Y. and Dussossoy, J. L., to be published in Applied Geochemistry.Google Scholar
13 Mendel, J. E., Final Report of the Defense High-Level Waste Leaching Mechanism Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-5157 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Charles, R. J., J. Appl. Phys. 22 (11), 1549–1560 (1959).Google Scholar
15 Friedman, I. and Long, W. D., Science 191, 247–253 (1976).Google Scholar
16 Jezek, P. A. and Noble, D. C., Amer. Mineral. 63, 266–273 (1978).Google Scholar
17 Aines, R. D., Weed, H. C., and Bates, J. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, 547–558 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Bates, J. K., Abrajano, T. A., Ebert, W. L., Mazer, J. J., and Gerding, T. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 122, 237–244 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Mazer, J. J., Bates, J. K., Bradley, J. P., Bradley, C. R., and Stevenson, C. M., Nature 357, 573–576(1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Vemaz, E. and Dussossoy, J. L., Basic Mechanisms of Aqueous Corrosion of Nuclear Waste Glasses. A Series of Final Reports (1985-1989). EUR-13605 (1991).Google Scholar
21 Pederson, L R., Baer, D. R., L McVay, G., and Engelhard, M. H., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 86, 369–380(1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Lanford, W. A., Davis, K., Lamarche, P., Laursen, T., and Groleau, R., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 23,249–266(1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Barkatt, A., Simmons, J. H., and Macedo, P. B., Nucl. Chem. Waste Mgmt. 2, 3–23 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Bunker, B. C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, 493–507 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Pederson, L R., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 28 (1), 17–21 (1987).Google Scholar
26 Lee, C. T. and Clark, D. E., Adv. in Ceram. 20, 541–550 (1986).Google Scholar
27 Knauss, K. G., Bourcier, W. L., McKeegan, K. D., Merzbacher, C. I., Nguyen, S. N., Ryerson, F. J., Smith, D. K., Week, H. D., and Newton, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 371–381 (1990).Google Scholar
28 Trotignon, L., “Aqueous Corrosion of Borosilicate Glasses-Nature and Properties of Alteration Layers,” Ph.D. Thesis, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, (1990).Google Scholar
29 Oversby, V. M. and L Phinney, D., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 228–246 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Lee, C. T. and Clark, D. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 221–228 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Casey, W. H., Eggleston, C., Johnsson, P. A., Westrich, H. R., and Hochella, M. F. Jr., Mat. Res. Soc. Bull. XVII (5), 23–29 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Grambow, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 15–27 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Strachan, D. M., Pederson, L. R., and Lokken, R. O., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 195–202(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Harker, A. B. and Flintoff, J. F., Nucl. Technol. 76, 263–275 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Petit, J.-C., Dran, J.-C., Trotignon, L., Casabonne, J.-M., and Paccagnella, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Svmp. Proc. 127, 33–40 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Casey, W. H. and Bunker, B., “Leaching of Mineral and Glass Surfaces during Dissolution,” Chapter 10 in Mineral-Water Interface Geochemistry. Vol. 23, Hochella, M. F. Jr. and White, A. F., Eds., Mineral. Soc. of America, Chelsea, pp. 397–426(1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37 Strachan, D. M., McGrail, B. P., Apted, M. J., Engle, D. W., and Eslinger, P. W., Preliminary Assessment of the Controlled Release of Radionuclides from Waste Packages Containing Borosilicate Waste Glasses, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-7591 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Grambow, B., Nuclear Waste Glass Dissolution: Mechanism. Model and Application, JSS Project Report JSS-87-02 (1987).Google Scholar
39 Grambow, B. et al. , Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, 143–150 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Van Iseghem, P., Amaya, T., Suzuki, Y., and Yamamoto, H., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 269–276 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41 Lemmens, K. and Van Iseghem, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, 49–56 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Grambow, B., “What do we know about nuclear waste glass performance in the repository near field?” SKB Technical Report No.9159, pp. 25-48 (1991).Google Scholar
43 L Hench, L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 125, 189–200 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 Trotignon, L., Petit, J.-C., Dran, J.-C., and Delia Mea, G., Ceram. Trans. 2, 229–239 (1990).Google Scholar
45 L Hench, L. and Clark, D. E., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 28, 83–105 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Wicks, G. G., Robnett, B. M., and Rankin, W. D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 11, 15–24 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Grambow, B. and Strachan, D. M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 26, 623–634 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 Chick, L A. and Pederson, L R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 26, 635–642 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 Conradt, R., Roggendorf, H., and Scholze, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 203–210 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 Van Iseghem, P., Berghman, K., Lemmens, K., Timermans, W., and Wang, L., Laboratory and In-Situ Interaction between Simulated Waste Glasses and Clay. Final Report 1986-1990, R/2869(1990).Google Scholar
51 L Hench, L., Clark, D. E., L Yen-Bower, E., Nucl. Chem. Waste Mgmt. 1, 59–75 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Houser, C., Tsong, I. S. T., and White, W. A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, McCarthy, G. J., ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 131–139 (1979).Google Scholar
53 Wicks, G. G., Mosley, W. C., Whitkop, P. G., and Saturday, K. A., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 49, 413–428(1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Buckwalter, C. Q. and Pederson, L R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 431–436 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Lewis, R. A., Myhra, S., L Segall, R., Smart, R. S. C., and Turner, P. S., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 53, 299–313(1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Malow, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 11, 25–36 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Harvey, K. B. and Larocque, C. A. B., Ceram. Trans, 9, 187–198 (1990).Google Scholar
58 Sales, B. C., Boatner, L A., Naramoto, H., and White, C. W., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 53, 201 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 Bunker, B. C. and Arnold, G. W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 15, 151–158 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60 Ishiguro, K., Kawanish, N., Sasaki, N., Nagaki, H., and Yamamoto, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 15, 135–142 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61 Wallace, R. M. and Wicks, G. G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 15, 23–28 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62 Abrajano, T. A. Jr., Bates, J. K., and Mazer, J. J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 108, 269–288 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63 Grambow, B., presented at 13th Internat. Congress on Glass, Hamburg, July 4-9, 1983.Google Scholar
64 L Kuhn, W. and Peters, R. D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 15, 167–174 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65 Pederson, L. R., Thomas, M. T., and McVay, G. L., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 13, 732–736 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66 Crovisier, J. L., Atassi, H., Daux, V., Honnorez, J., Petit, J.-C., and Eberhart, J. P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 127, 41–48 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67 Conradt, R. and Roggendorf, H., “Determination of the Corrosion Mechanism of High-Level Waste Containing Glass,” Fraunhofer-lnstitute fur Silicatforschung, DE88 754321 (1985).Google Scholar
68 Feng, X., Pegg, I. L., Yan, Q., Mao, X., and Macedo, P. B., Ceram. Trans. 22, 95–104 (1991).Google Scholar
69 Ebert, W. L. and Bates, J. K., Proc. 3rd Internat. High-Level Radioactive Waste Mgmt. Conf., Amer. Nucl. Soc, Las Vegas, NV, April 12-16,1992, Vol. X, pp. 934–942 (1992).Google Scholar
70 Barkatt, A., Saad, E. E., Adiga, R., Sousanpour, W., Barkatt, Al., Adel-Hadai, M. A., O’Keefe, J. A., and Alterescu, S., Appl. Geochem. 4, 593–603 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71 Strachan, D. M., Nucl. Chem. Waste Mgmt. 4,177–188 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72 Grambow, B. and Strachan, D. M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 122, 713–724 (1988).Google Scholar
73 Mounche, E., and Vernaz, E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 703–712 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74 Bourcier, W. L., Peiffer, D. W., Knauss, K. G., McKeegan, K. D., and Smith, D. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 209–216 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75 Bates, J. K., Jardine, L. J., and Steindler, M. J., Science 213, 51–53 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76 Abrajano, T. A., Bates, J. K., Woodland, A. B., Bradley, J. P., and Bourcier, W. L., Clays and Clay Minerals 38, 537–548 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77 L Ebert, W., Bates, J. K., and L Bourcier, W., Waste Mgmt. 11, 205–221 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78 Advocat, T., L Crovisier, J., Fritz, B., and Vernaz, E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 241–248(1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79 Jantzen, C. M. and Plodinec, M. J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 67, 207–223 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80 Feng, X., “Composition Effects on Chemical Durability and Viscosity of Nuclear Waste Glasses-Systematic Studies and Structural Thermodynamic Models,” Ph.D. Thesis, Catholic University of America, (1988).Google Scholar
81 Petit, J.-C., Magontheir, M.-C., Drawn, J.-C., and Delia Mea, G., J. Mat. Sci. 25, 3048–3052 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82 Feng, X., Bates, J. K., Bradley, C. R., Buck, E. C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 224, 207–217(1993).Google Scholar
83 Van Iseghem, P. and Grambow, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 631–639 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84 Allen, C. C., Lane, D. L., Johnston, R. G., Marcy, A. D., and Adee, R. R., Mat. Res Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 451–458 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85 Haaker, R., Malow, G., and Offermann, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44,121–128 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86 Vernaz, E., Advocat, T., and Dussossoy, J. L., Ceram. Trans. 9, 175–185 (1989).Google Scholar
87 Lutze, W., Muller, R., and Montserrat, W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 575–584 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88 Lanza, F., Manara, A., Mammarella, L., Blasi, P., and Ceccone, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 685–691 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89 L Ebert, W. and Bates, J. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 89–97 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90 Bates, J. K., L Ebert, W., Feng, X., and L Bourcier, W., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 198–227 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91 Paul, A., J. Mater. Sci. 12, 2246–2268 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
92 Feng, X. and Barkatt, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 543–554 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93 Vernaz, E., Loida, A., Malow, G., Marples, J. A. C., and Matzke, H. J., Long-Term Stability of High Level Waste Forms, EUR-13389 (1991).Google Scholar
94 Ebert, W. L., Bates, J. K., and Gerding, T. J., The Reaction of Glass during Gamma Irradiation in a Saturated Tuff Environment. Part 4: SRL 165. ATM-1c. and ATM-8 Glasses at 1EЗ R/h and 0 R/h, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-90/13 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95 Vernaz, E. Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 257, 37–48 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96 Hall, A. R., Hough, A., and Marples, J. A. C., Leach Testing of Fully Active MW Glass. Harwell Laboratory Report, Oxfordshire, AERE-R-13071, DSG(87)p25, ILWRP(88)PO6 (1988).Google Scholar
97 Fillet, S., L Nogues, J., Vernaz, E., and Jacquet-Francillon, N., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 211–218 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98 Werme, L., Bjorner, I. K., Bart, G., Zwicky, H. U., Grambow, B., Lutze, W., Ewing, R. C., and Magrabi, C., J. Mater. Res. 5,1130–1146(1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99 Ewart, F. T., Howse, R. M., Thomason, H. P., Williams, S. J., and Cross, J. E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 701–708 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100 Nogues, J. L., Vernaz, E. Y., Jacquet-Francillon, N., and Pasquini, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 195–204 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101 Ewing, R. C., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 57–68 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
102 Ewing, R. C. and Jercinovic, M. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, 67–83 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103 Ewing, R. C., Proc. 3rd Internat. Symp. on Adv. Nucl. Energy Res., pp. 1–9 (1991).Google Scholar
104 Jercinovic, M. J., Kaser, S. A., Ewing, R. C., and Lutze, W., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 355–362(1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
105 Bates, J. K., Feng, X., Bradley, C. R., and Buck, E. C., Waste Manage. ’92, pp.1047–1053 (1992).Google Scholar
106 Ebert, W. L. and Bates, J. K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, 339–346 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
107 Wronkiewicz, D. J., Wang, L M., Bates, J. K., and Tani, B. S., this volume (1994).Google Scholar
108 Bates, J. K., Bradley, J. P., Teetsov, A., Bradley, C. R., ten Brink Buchholtz, M., Science 256, 649–651 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
109 Nitsche, H., Mat. Res'. Soc. Symp. Proc. 252, 289–298 (1992).Google Scholar
110 Rother, A., Lutze, W., and Schubert-Bischoff, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 251, 57–64 (1992).Google Scholar
111 Nesbitt, H. W., Markovics, G., and Price, R. C., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 1659–1666 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
112 Bailey, S. W., “Crystal Chemistry of the True Micas,” in Reviews in Mineralogy. Vol. 13, Chap. 2, Bailey, S. W., ed., Mineral. Soc. Amer. pp. 13–60 (1984).Google Scholar
113 Wronkiewicz, D. J. and Condie, K. C., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51, 2401–2416 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
114 Crovisier, J.L., Advocat, T., Petit, J.C., Fritz, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 127, 57–72 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
115 Goto, Y., Matsuzawa, J., and Matsuda, S., Proc. of Developments in Sedimentology, 35th Internat. Clay Conf., Olphen, H. V. and Veniale, F., Eds., September 6-12, 1981, Bologna & Pavia, Italy, Elsevier Amsterdam, pp. 789–797 (1982).Google Scholar
116 Sturchio, N. C., Bohlke, J. K., and Binz, C. M., Geochim. Casmochim. Acta, 53, 1025–1034 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar