Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:14:55.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Electronic Properties of Ionimplanted Laser-Annealed Si(111)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D.E. Eastman ,
P. Heimann ,
F.J. Himpsel ,
B. Reihl ,
D.M. Zehner  and
C.W. White
D.E. Eastman
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
P. Heimann
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
F.J. Himpsel
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
B. Reihl
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
D.M. Zehner
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
C.W. White
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA
Get access

Abstract

Highly-degenerate As-doped n-type and B-doped p-type Si(l11)−(1×1) surfaces have been prepared via ion implantation and laser annealing and studied using photoemission. For As concentrations of ∼4–7%, surface states become very different from those for intrinsic Si(l11)−(1×1) and the Fermi level EF at the surface moves to the conduction band minima resulting in a zero height n-type Schottky barrier. Emission from the conduction band minima has been directly viewed in momentum space.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 4: Symposium A – Laser and Electron-Beam Interactions with Solids , 1981 , 261
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Zehner, D.M., White, C.W. and Ownby, G.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 56 (1980);Google Scholar
Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 456 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Zehner, D.M., White, C.W., Ownby, G.W. and Christie, W.H., in Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, ed. by White, E.W. and Peercy, P.S. (Academic New York, 1980) p.201.Google Scholar
3. Zehner, D.M., White, C.W., Heimann, P., Peihl, B., Himpsel, F.J. and Eastman, D.E., Phys. Rev. B24, 4875 (1981).Google Scholar
4. McKinley, A., Parke, A.W., Hughes, G.J., Fryar, J. and Williams, R.H., J. Phys.D, Appl. Phys. 13, L193 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Chabal, Y.J., Rowe, J.E. and Zwemer, D.A., Phys. Rev. Lett 46, 600 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Eastman, D.E., Heimann, P., Himpsel, F.J., Reihl, B., Zehner, D.M. and White, C.W., Phys. Rev. B24, 3647 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Eastman, D.E., Donelon, J.J., Hien, N.C. and Himpsel, F.J., Nucl. Instr. Methods 172, 327 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Energy-dependent escape depths were determined from hν–dependent surface core–level intensities (Ref.13) and from published data (e.g., Refs. 9 and 10).Google Scholar
9. Allen, F.G. and Giobeli, G.W., Phys. Rev. 127, 150 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Eberhardt, W., Kalkoffen, G., Kunz, C., Aspnes, D. and Cardona, M., Phys. Status Solidi(b) 88, 135 (1978).Google Scholar
11. White, C.W., Wilson, F.R., Appleton, D.R. and Young, F.W. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 738 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Feher, G., Phys. Rev 114, 1219 (1959) has determined that Δmin/X = 0.85, i.e., kl1 = 0.80A−1 for our (111) surface.Google Scholar
13. Himpsel, F.J., Heimann, P., Chiang, T.–C. and Eastman, D.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1112 (1980).Google Scholar