Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:23:29.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface and Interface Stress in Epitaxial Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

H. Ibach  and
A. Grossmann.
H. Ibach
Affiliation:
Institut für Grenzflächenforschung und Vakuumphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D 52425 Jülich, Germany
A. Grossmann.
Affiliation:
Institut für Grenzflächenforschung und Vakuumphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D 52425 Jülich, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Recent experimental measurements on the interface stresses in two heteroepitaxial systems have shown that the interface stresses were unexpectedly large. For thin deposited layers, the interface stress can exceed the stress caused by the lattice mismatch by far. Arguments are presented which indicate that the surface stress may be caused by the charge transfer between the deposit and the substrate. The consequences for the critical thickness of pseudomorphic films are discussed and it is shown that depending on the sign of the interface stress and the mismatch the critical thickness can be either reduced or enhanced by a large factor.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 440: Symposia CA – Structure and Evolution of Surfaces , 1996 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Grossmann, A., Erley, W., Hannon, J. B., and lbach, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 127 Google Scholar
[2] Grossmann, A., Thesis RWTH Aachen, D80 (1996)Google Scholar
[3] For a review see Ibach, H., Rep. Surf. Sci., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
[4] Sander, D., Linke, U., lbach, H., Surf. Sci. 272, 318 (1992)Google Scholar
[5] Grossmann, A., Erley, W., Ibach, H., Surf. Rev. Lett. 2, 543 (1995)Google Scholar
[6] Sander, D., Ibach, H., Phys. Rev. B 43, 4263 (1991)Google Scholar
[7] Stoney, G. G., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 82, 172 (1909)Google Scholar
[8] Brantley, W. A., J. Appl. Phys 44 (1973) 534 Google Scholar
[9] Cammarata, R. C., Prog. Surface Sci. 46, 1 (1994)Google Scholar
[10] Becker, A. F., Rosenfeld, G., Poelsema, B., Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 477 (1993)Google Scholar
[11] Röder, H., Schuster, R., Brune, H., Kern, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2086 (1993)Google Scholar
[12] Davies, P. W., Quinlan, M. A., Somorjai, G. A., Surf. Sci. 121, 290 (1982)Google Scholar
[13] Vegt, H. A. van der, Pinxteren, H. M. van, Lohmeier, M., Vlieg, E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3335 (1992)Google Scholar
[14] Hannon, J. B., Giesen, M., Stapel, D., Icking-Konert, G. Schulze, Müller, J. E.. to be publishedGoogle Scholar
[15] Brune, H., Bromann, K., Röder, H., and Kern, K., Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 2997 Google Scholar
[16] Alerhand, O. L., Vanderbilt, D., Meade, R. D., and Joannopoulos, J. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1973 Google Scholar
[17] Zeppenfeld, P., Krzyzowski, M., Romainczyk, Ch., Comsa, G., and Lagally, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 2737 Google Scholar
[18] Zeppenfeld, P., Krzyzowski, M. A., Romainczyk, Ch., David, R., Comsa, G., Röder, H., Bromann, K., Brune, H. and Kern, K., Surface Sci. 342 (1995) L1131 Google Scholar