Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:46:12.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface and Bulk Properties which Influence Ion-Beam Hydrogenation of Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Robert A. Anderson
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Carleton H. Seager
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The time evolution of dopant passivation in p and n-type silicon Schottky and MIS barriers has been investigated for low-energy H ions implanted directly into the silicon through a 400-Å front-electrode metallization. Knowledge of the dependence of the near-surface hydrogen concentration on time and experimental parameters is crucial to the analysis of these experiments. Hydrogenation effects are observed to vanish at ion energies below 800 eV, which suggests that the front electrode, rather than being a source of H, will behave as a sink for H diffusing in the silicon. Accordingly, we show that a steady-state H concentration proportional to the ion-deposition flux and deposition depth is established in a time interval less than a second near the electrode. Although some of the mobile H appears to be in a positively charged state, we calculate that the bias voltage applied to samples has only a small influence on the near-surface H concentration. An extensive study of the effects of sample temperature, beam flux, and ion energy supports these concepts and has revealed no evidence of ion-damage induced H trapping. The possible importance of H.H recombination is suggested by data obtained at the higher H concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Seager, C. H. and Anderson, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1181 (1988).Google Scholar
2 Seager, C. H. and Anderson, R. A., in this symposium.Google Scholar
3 Seager, C. H., Anderson, R. A., and Brice, D. K., to be published.Google Scholar
4 UTI 100C Quadrupole Mass Analyzer Operating Manual (Uthe Technology International, Sunnyvale, CA, 1977), Appendix C.Google Scholar