Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:09:41.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Super Sims for Ultrasensitive Impurity Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J. M. Anthony
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Dallas,TX 75265.
D. J. Donahue
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Arizona
A. J. T. Jull
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Arizona
Get access

Abstract

The technique of accelerator mass spectrometry has been used extensively in recent years as a method for detecting low levels (< 1 part per trillion atomic) of radioactive isotopes in solid materials. The technique consists of a Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometer (SIMS) system in which the conventional mass spectrometer has been replaced by a particle accelerator. We have applied this method to the study of stable elements, primarily semiconductor dopants, using the Univ. of Arizona tandem accelerator mass spectrometer. The use of tandem accelerators allows molecular interferences to be removed due to dissociation of the molecules. Particle energies of several MeV are produced, and energy spectroscopy removes the background due to scattered particles, detector noise, etc. to provide positive particle identification. The current detection limits (-10 parts per billion atomic) are primarily due to ion source contamination and their origin is discussed. Removal of this contamination will allow parts per trillion level detection of stable elements.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Muller, R., Science 196, 489 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Purser, K.H., Liebert, R.B., Litherland, A.E., Beukens, R.P., Gove, H.E., Bennett, C.L., Clover, M.R. and Sondheim, W.E., Rev. Phys. Appl. 12, 1487 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Litherland, A.E., Beukens, R.P., Kilius, L.R., Rucklidge, J.C., Gove, H.E., Elmore, D. and Purser, K.H., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 186, 463 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Wittkower, A.B. and Betz, H.D., At. Data 5, 113 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Middleton, R., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 144, 373 (1977).Google Scholar