Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:46:24.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of the Deactivation of High Concentration, Laser Annealed Dopant Profiles in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Yayoi Takamura
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305
Sameer Jain
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305
Peter B. Griffin
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305
James D. Plummer
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305
Get access

Abstract

As semiconductor device dimensions continue to decrease, the main challenge in the area of junction formation involves decreasing the junction depth while simultaneously increasing the active dopant concentration. Laser annealing is being investigated as an alternative to rapid thermal annealing (RTA) to repair the damage from ion implantation and to activate the dopants. With this technique, uniform, box-shaped profiles are obtained, with dopant concentrations that can exceed equilibrium solubility limits. Unfortunately, these super-saturated dopant concentrations exist in a metastable state and deactivate upon further thermal processing. In this work, a comprehensive study of the deactivation kinetics of common dopants (P, B, and Sb) was performed across a range of annealing conditions. For comparison, As deactivation data from the work of Rousseau et al.1 is also presented. Each dopant exhibits different deactivation behavior, however, As and P can be classified as unstable species while B and Sb are stable against deactivation until higher temperatures of 700-800°C. In addition, a means of maintaining these metastably doped layers is being investigated with the goal of meeting the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) requirements for ultrashallow junctions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Rousseau, P.M., Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1994); P.M. Rousseau, P.B. Griffin, W.T. Fang, J.D. Plummer, J. Appl. Phys., 82 (7) 3593 (1998)Google Scholar
2 Trumbore, F.A, Bell System Tech. J., 39, 205 (1960)Google Scholar
3 Armigliato, A., Nobili, D., Ostoja, P., Servidori, M., Solmi, S., Semiconductor Silicon, 1977, Electrochemical Society, (1977) p. 638 Google Scholar
4 Masetti, G., Nobili, D., Solmi, S., Semiconductor Silicon 1977, Electrochemical Society, (1977), p. 648 Google Scholar
5 Solmi, S., Nobili, D., Shao, J., J. Appl. Phys., 87 (2), 658 (2000)Google Scholar
6 Nobili, D., Carabelas, A., Celotti, G., Solmi, S., J. Electrochem Soc., 130(4) 922, (1983)Google Scholar
7 Stolk, P.A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D.J., Jacobson, D.C., Poate, J.M., Luftman, H.S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 66 (5) 568 (1995)Google Scholar
8 Fair, R.B., Weber, G.R., J. Appl. Phys., 44, 273 (1973)Google Scholar
9 Ramamoorthy, M., Pantelides, S.T., Phys. Rev. Lett., 76 (25) 4753 (1996)Google Scholar
10 Pandey, K.C., Erbil, A., Cargill, G.S., Boehme, R.F., Vanderbilt, D., Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 1282 (1988)Google Scholar
11 Guerroro, E., Potzl, H., Tielert, R., Grasserbauer, M., Stingeder, G., J. Electrochem. Soc., 129 (8), 1826 (1982)Google Scholar
12 Luning, S., Rousseau, P.M., Griffin, P.B., Carey, P.G., Plummer, J.D., Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet., 457 (1992)Google Scholar
13 Larsen, A. Nylandsted, Kringhoj, P., Hansen, J. Lundsgaard, Shiryaev, S. Yu., J. Appl. Phys., 81 (5) 2173 (1997)Google Scholar
14 Gaiduk, P., Fage-Pedersen, J., Hansen, J. Lundsgaard, Larsen, A. Nylandsted, Phys. Rev. B, 59 (11) 7278 (1999)Google Scholar
15 Fage-Pedersen, J., Gaiduk, P., Hansen, J. Lundsgaard, Larsen, A. Nylandsted, J. Appl. Phys., 88 (6) 3254 (2000)Google Scholar