Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:53:01.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study Of Domain Boundary Structures In Lead Titanate Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. C. Chou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
J. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
C. M. Wayman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Get access

Abstract

Domain boundary structures of flux-grown poly-domain lead titanate single crystals have been studied using transmission electron microscopy. 90° and 180° domain boundaries were seen in the crystals and were systematically analyzed under various diffraction conditions. Although 90° domain boundaries are supposely δ-type boundaries in BaTiO3, our results show that displacement plays an important role at boundaries and the extreme fringe contrast (EFC) behavior of 90° boundaries is of the mixed type. In the present work, an analysis based upon the two beam dynamical theory was conducted and a rule similar to stacking-fault contrast analysis was established to predict the geometric configuration of a 180° domain boundary using EFC behavior. Examples are given and verified by tilting experiments and electron diffraction. The results are consistent and offer a convenient way to distinguish between 90° and 180° boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hu, Y.H., Chan, H.M., Wen, Z.X., and Harmer, M.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 69 [8], (1986) 594.Google Scholar
2. Tanaka, M. and Honjo, G., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 19 (1964) 954.Google Scholar
3. Shakmanov, V.V., Spivak, G.V. and Yakunin, S.I., Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 12 [8], (1971) 1827.Google Scholar
4. Gevers, R., Van Landuyt, J., and Amelinckx, S., Phys. stat. sol., 11 (1965) 689.Google Scholar
5. Gevers, R., Delavignette, P., Blank, H., and Amelinckx, S., Phys. stat. sol., 4 (1964) 383.Google Scholar
6. Gevers, R., Delavignette, P., Van Landuyt, J., and Amelinckx, S., Phys.stat.sol., 5 (1964) 595.Google Scholar
7. Gevers, R., Blank, H., and Amelinckx, S., Phys. stat. sol., 13 (1966) 449.Google Scholar
8. Malis, T. and Gleiter, H., J. Appl. Phys., 47 (1976) 5196.Google Scholar
9. Suchicital, C.T., Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois (1988).Google Scholar
10. Humphreys, C. J., Howie, A., and Booker, G. R., Phil. Mag., 15 (1967) 507.Google Scholar
11. Hirsch, P. B., Howie, A., Nicholson, R.B., Pashley, D.W. and Whelan, M. J., Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals, R. E. Krieger Publishing Co., New York, (1977).Google Scholar