Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:43:23.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and Composition of Rhinoceros Horn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Ann Chidester Van Orden
Affiliation:
Analytical Services and Materials, 107 Research Dr., Hampton, VA 23666
Joseph C. Daniel Jr.
Affiliation:
Old Dominion University, Dept. of Biology, Norfolk, VA.
Get access

Abstract

Rhinoceros horn has been used medicinally and as a talisman in many cultures and animals are slaughtered to obtain the horn. With the dwindling populations of rhinos, and the limited number and breeding success of captive rhinos, there is a critical need to learn as much as is possible about their horns to find an adequate substitute. Examination of rhino horn was made using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and x-ray diffraction (XRD). The structure of the horn is unusual and consists of two separate phases, one of hair-like filaments, built around a central core in circumferential layers and the other surrounding and filling in the spaces between the filaments as a matrix. Together, these two structures make up a biological composite, structurally similar to metal, ceramic or polymer based composites. The structural morphology, the dimensions of the structures, and the chemistry of the horn are discussed. Comparisons are made between horn, hoof, and hair of rhinos and hoof and hair from horses, their nearest living relatives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rhino Global Captive Action Plan, N.Y., 1992, IUNC and SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Groups Workshop.Google Scholar
2. Mace, G. and Lande, R., Conservation Biology 5, 148 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Ryder, M., Nature 193, 1199 (1962).Google Scholar
4. Earland, C., Blakely, P., and Stell, J., Nature. 196, 1287 (1962).Google Scholar
5. Lynch, L., Robinson, V., and Anderson, C., Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 26, 395 (1973).Google Scholar
6. Penny, M., Rhinos: Endangered Species, page 116, Facts on File, N.Y, N.Y., 1992.Google Scholar
7. Budras, K.-D., Hullinger, R., and Sack, W., Am. J. Vet. Res. 50, 1150 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Bertram, J. and Gosline, J., J. Exp. Biol. 130, 121 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Samata, M. and Matsuda, J., Jpn. J. Vet Sci. 50, 333 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Beddard, F., Cambridge Natural History Vol.10, Macmillian, London, 1902.Google Scholar
11. Anthony, H., Bull. N.Y. Zoo. Soc. 31, 170 (1928).Google Scholar
12. Marshall, R., Orwin, D., and Gillespie, J., Elect. Mic. Reviews 4, 47 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Martin, E. and Martin, C., Run, Rhino, Run, Chatto and Windus, London, 1982.Google Scholar
14. Baer, E., Hiltner, A., and Morgan, R., Physics Today 45 (October), 60 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Burger, J., Buzzworm- Environmental Journal 2, 20 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Martin, E. and Vigne, L., Swara 10, 25 (1987).Google Scholar