Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:01:04.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Transformations During Growth of Epitaxial Fe(001) Thin Films on Cu(001) and Pt(001)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

B. M. Clemens ,
T. C. Hufnagel ,
M. C. Kautzky  and
J.-F. Bobo
B. M. Clemens
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
T. C. Hufnagel
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
M. C. Kautzky
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
J.-F. Bobo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305–2205
Get access

Abstract

We have used grazing incidence x-ray diffraction to observe the structural evolution during growth of sputter-deposited epitaxial Fe films on Cu(001) and Pt(001). We find that on Cu(001), Fe is fcc up to a thickness of 10–12 monolayers, whereupon bcc Fe is observed in first the Pitsch and then the Bain orientations. The fcc Fe shows some relaxation of the misfit from the Cu, as do the Pitsch orientation bcc, which is in tension, and the Bain orientation bcc, which is in compression. All three Fe variants exist in a 40 monolayer thick film. On Pt(001) the Fe grows as bcc with the Bain orientation. However, a thin (20 å) bcc Fe film is transformed to fcc Fe with cube-on-cube orientation by subsequent deposition of Pt. This behavior is consistent with intermixing of Pt into the Fe layer, which lowers the mismatch and bulk chemical energies of the fcc phase relative to that of the bcc phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 436: Symposium CC – Thin Films Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI , 1996 , 9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schmailzl, P., Schmidt, K., Bayer, P., Düll, R., and Heinz, K.. Surface Science, 312:73, 1994.Google Scholar
2. Wuttig, M. and Thomassen, J.. Surface Science, 282:237, 1993.Google Scholar
3. Bayer, P., Müller, S., Schmailzl, P., and Heinz, K.. Phys. Rev. B, 48:17611, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Magnan, H., Chandesris, D.D., Vilette, B., Heckmann, O., and Lecante, J.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:859, 1991.Google Scholar
5. Clarke, A., Rous, P.J., Arnott, M., Jennings, H., and Willis, R.F.. Surface Science, 292:L843, 1987.Google Scholar
6. Wuttig, M., Feldmann, B., Thomassen, J., May, F., Zillgen, H., Brodde, A., Hannemann, H., and Neddermeyer, H.. Surface Science, 291:14, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Müller, S., Bayer, P., Kinne, A., Schmailzl, P., and Heinz, K.. Surface Science, 322:21, 1995.Google Scholar
8. Barth, J.V. and Fowler, D.E.. Phys. Rev. B, 52:11432, 1995.Google Scholar
9. Koike, J. and Nastasi, M.. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 202:13, 1991.Google Scholar
10. Daniels, B.J.. Ph. D. thesis, Stanford University, 1995.Google Scholar
11. Daniels, B.J., Nix, W.D., and Clemens, B.M.. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 356:373, 1995.Google Scholar
12. Sakurai, M.. J. Appl. Phys., 76:7272, 1994.Google Scholar
13. Visokay, M.R., Lairson, B.M., Clemens, B.M., and Sinclair, R.. J. Magn. Magn. Mat., 126:136, 1993.Google Scholar
14. Lairson, B.M., Visokay, M.R., Sinclair, R., Hagstrom, S., and Clemens, B.M.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 61:1390, 1992.Google Scholar
15. Payne, A.P., Clemens, B.M., and Brennan, S.. Rev. Sci. Instr., 63:1147, 1992.Google Scholar
16. Fuoss, P.H. and Brennan, S.. Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci., 20:365, 1990.Google Scholar
17. Jesser, W. and Matthews, J.. Phil. Mag., 15:1097, 1967.Google Scholar
18. Giergiel, J., Shen, J., Woltersdorf, J., Kirilyuk, A., and Kirschner, J.. Phys. Rev. B, 52:8528, 1995.Google Scholar
19. Smith, D.L.. Thin Film Deposition: Principles and Practice. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
20. Payne, A.P., Lairson, B.M., Brennan, S., Daniels, B.J., Rensing, N.M., and Clemens, B.M.. Phys. Rev. B, 47:16064, 1993.Google Scholar
21. Lairson, B.M., Payne, A.P., Brennan, S., Rensing, N.M., Daniels, B.J., and Clemens, B.M.. J. Appl. Phys., 78:4449, 1995.Google Scholar
22. Nix, W.D.. Met. Trans. A, 20A:2217, 1989.Google Scholar
23. King, H.W.. J. Mat. Sci., 1:79, 1966.Google Scholar
24. Villars, P. and Calvert, L.D.. Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Dntermetallic Phases. American Society for Metals, Metals Parks, OH, 1985.Google Scholar